To post a rebuttal seems like it would sound like a "angry at the review" writer. Yet, it is clear that the person who reviewed the book had an agenda, took one line from the preface out of context, and either didn't fully read the book, or wilfully ignored text that contradicted his/her (unsigned) criticism. As it is a non-fiction book, I could pull literally pages of text that contradict the reviewer's complaint and point of view. It's one of the primary reviewing companies that you see on Amazon, B&N, etc. A bad review would be an unpleasant experience to contend with but what should you do with an erroneous one? Is there any viable recourse? Is it worth worrying about? In the history of book reviews, has one ever been retracted?
2007-09-14
13:51:48
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous