I suggest that, because language allows me, nothing is both something and everything, everything is both nothing and something, and something is both nothing and everything.
I also suggest that by the boundless nature of infinity, it must be nothing, and by the same nature nothing must also be infinite.
Further, i suggest that language is a terrible idea and 'things' are best understood without using it. But not many will agree. Certainly not people who are so keen to share their 'knowledge'
2007-06-26
00:47:59
·
25 answers
·
asked by
plop
3
in
Philosophy