I'm talking about extraneous things--a pretty skirt, a scoop of ice cream. Or even an expensive college education. It seems so unfair to say, "my happiness is more important than your life."
But the implications of accepting that you shouldn't spend money on yourself are tricky. Does that mean that the purpose of life is to help others? That buying anything that isn't completely necessary for life is morally wrong? Where do you draw the line? And why?
2007-04-21
07:56:37
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Freudchild
1
in
Philosophy