Which is worse....
1. The BCS system that combines human polls and computer rankings to select #1 and #2 ... and doesn't publish it's first rankings until several weeks of the season are complete, so that a good "baseline" can be established....
or..
2. The silly "pre-season" rankings that are based on "last year" and speculation? Is this why there were so many "upsets" this year, because teams like Michigan, USC, etc. were ranked too high before ANY GAMES HAD ACTUALLY BEEN PLAYED ?
2007-12-03
08:50:04
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Football (American)