...calling for the assassination of someone he hates?
The recent miami group of christian terrorists (they were NOT Muslims; they studied the bible, etc) were arrested simply for WANTING to murder, but had not taken any actions or even have an actual plan.
So, what is the difference between this and Pat Robertson calling for assassination of a world leader? Is it okay because we don't like who he wanted killed -Venezuelan Pres. Hugo Chavez?
George W Bush didn't call on an assassination of Saddam - that would've been illegal & immoral. "Bringing him to justice" means a trial with evidence & sentencing, not "street justice" & murder.
So, why isn't Pat Robertsons desires treated like the boys from miami? Why doesn't the government send someone undercover to entice and entrap Mr. Robertson? What of women with abusers stalking them? Men can't be arrested unless they DO something.
So, what do you think - should Mr. Robertson be arrested on terrorism charges or not? Why or why not? Thx!
2006-07-12
05:05:39
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Niqabi
4
in
Religion & Spirituality