With thanks to Beetleman, for the link to the url for the full text.
Here are the *other* words in the text (emphasis in caps added) -
"It is possible, according to Catholic doctrine, to AFFIRM CORRECTLY that the Church of Christ IS PRESENT and OPERATIVE in the CHURCHES AND ECCLESIAL COMMUNITIES NOT YET FULLY IN COMMUNION WITH THE Catholic Church, ON ACCOUNT OF the elements of sanctification and TRUTH that are present in them. (9) Nevertheless, the word "subsists" can only be attributed to the Catholic Church alone precisely because it refers to the mark of unity that we profess in the symbols of the faith (I believe... in the "one" Church); and this "one" Church subsists in the Catholic Church. (10) "
"Third Question: Why was the expression "subsists in" adopted instead of the simple word "is"?
Response: The use of this expression, which indicates the full identity of the Church of Christ with the Catholic Church, does not change the doctrine on the Church. Rather, it comes from and brings out more clearly the fact that there are "numerous elements of sanctification and of truth" which are found outside her structure, but which "as gifts properly belonging to the Church of Christ, impel towards Catholic Unity" (11).
"It follows that these separated churches and Communities, though we believe they suffer from defects, are deprived neither of significance nor importance in the mystery of salvation. In fact the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as instruments of salvation, whose value derives from that fullness of grace and of truth which has been entrusted to the Catholic Church" (12).
Does the above sound like the Pope said that there is no truth of Christ in churches other than the Catholic Church? No!
2007-07-11
05:34:41
·
17 answers
·
asked by
autumnleaves
3