A theory by definition has to do with conjectures, hypotheses and unproven assumptions.
Evolution is not a scientific theory neither is Creation for that matter.
Evolution nor Creation is not testable. (FACT).
Evolution and Creation are equally religious. You will either have faith in one or the other. Neither can be proven.(FACT).
Have faith dear friend in GOD.
Genesis 1:1
"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth"
Isaiah 45:18
"For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the Lord; and there is none else".
Colossians 1:16
"For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: VS 17.And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
FAITH-GOD
2007-07-11 05:45:54 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Perhaps they have not yet come up with another story to explain where the first cell came from?
Life without the Lord must be very frustrating!
2007-07-11 05:49:46 · answer #1 · answered by BowtiePasta 6 · 3⤊ 9⤋
You are literally the opposite of correct in every way.
"A theory by definition has to do with conjectures, hypotheses and unproven assumptions." This is NOT what a scientific theory is.
"Evolution is not a scientific theory neither is Creation for that matter." Evolution is in fact a theory, Creationism is a hypothesis at best.
"Evolution nor Creation is not testable." It is and has been tested. Test involving evolution supports the theory.
"Evolution and Creation are equally religious. You will either have faith in one or the other. Neither can be proven." evolution is in no way a religion. Evolution deals with science, religions are belief systems.
2007-07-11 08:05:22 · answer #2 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wish it is basically trolling. From the link decrease than, relating teams like the invention Institute, who perpetuate the varieties of nonsense your spouting: "Evolution needless to say has no scarcity of controversies. yet none of those controversies contain the effortless innovations of evolution, and all of them perform interior a framework the place random mutation and determination play a key function in growing to be different species that are appropriate via easy descent. it is sparkling that the invention Institute is making an attempt to introduce controversies that don't exist, on an identical time as ignoring people who do. it is why the educational freedom expenses it is advertising are such risky issues; on an identical time as supposedly advertising psychological diagnosis, they are easily an attempt to pave the way for incorrect information to flow into the scientific college room. Is there room for the actual controversies interior the lecture room of public colleges? possibly, yet i'm no longer in any way confident. i could be pleasantly bowled over if the customary extreme college student left understanding what horizontal gene flow is, what the proteasome does, or the importance of the Archaea. understanding how those issues play out interior the present scientific understanding of evolution is going to be previous all however the main progressed scholars. coaching even the actual controversies would basically be undesirable pedagogy. " generally i does no longer replica and paste, yet this replaced into properly written and that i did no longer experience like dropping too lots time answering this question. in case you truly should recognize extra approximately what the controversies approximately evolution are, there are some that have been defined right here article.
2016-11-09 00:43:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You obviously have no idea what a scientific theory is.
A scientific theory has nothing to do with conjecture, hypotheses or unproven assumptions.
A scientific theory is an explanation for observed data that fits all of the evidence.
The theory of biological evolution through natural selection IS a scientific theory, and it is testable, and is also falsifiable - which is what makes it a scientific theory. It continues to be accepted because it does fit all of the physical evidence gathered from the fields of biology, genetics, and geology, as well as fossil evidence, and also provides predictions of other findings which can and have been verified through other gathered evidence.
No scientific theory is ever 'proven' - including the theory of gravity, the germ theory of disease propagation, the theory of relativity, or the theory of heliocentrism. Scientific theories only remain in acceptance or are rejected.
Evolution is not a theory in crisis, it remains the mostly strongly supported scientific theory in biology, and the predictions and implications of the theory explain everything about modern biology, from why resistant strains of bacteria develop, to why our anatomy and physiology matches those of the great apes, to why there are koalas and kangaroos in Australia, porcupines in Canada, and hippos in Africa.
There is nothing in the theory of evolution that is contradictory with the idea that God directed the whole process (if that is how you choose to believe), but it is contradictory with the idea that God created all organisms in their current forms 6000 years ago. That particular belief is not a scientific theory.
2007-07-11 05:56:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Exactly how is it in crisis? The majority of people all over the world know that the theory of evolution is fact. Just about the only people left in the entire world that don't accept the theory of evolution is a group of American fundamentalist Christians.
You can twist the truth about it all you want, continue telling lies, falsely calling it a "religion", and spewing the nonsense that these fundamentalists desperately cling to, but it doesn't make "creation" any more true. The "creation" theory was COMPLETELY MADE UP over 2000 years ago by uneducated, superstitious middle-eastern sheep herders, because they had no scientific knowledge, and no way to investigate the origins of our existence. It has not one single iota of evidence to back it up. The evolution theory has so much evidence to back it up, that only the most willfully ignorant can refuse to believe it.
Your Bible quotes are evidence of squat.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13npz5nv_...
http://www.creationtheory.org/
http://www.daltonator.net/durandal/relig...
http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/h...
http://www.abarnett.demon.co.uk/atheism/...
http://www.talkorigins.org/
2007-07-11 06:29:53 · answer #5 · answered by Jess H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are obviously a wishful thinker.
Evolution has been proved many times over.
Here are a few more theory's you can argue against.
Relativity (Proved)
Quantum (Proved)
Thermodynamics (Proved)
Newtons Laws of motion aren't theorys as they describe the effects of inertia not defining what inertia is.
If evolution simply said that species evolve from other species and showed it from fossils it would be a law.
Not only does the origin of species describe the effect it also defines what causes it, hence it is a theory.
You will never be convinced unless you want to be, and you obviously don't want to be convinced. You think by asking inane questions that you'll get people to suddenly realize how wrong they were the entire time.
You gota be kidding me.
2007-07-11 06:02:01 · answer #6 · answered by ♥Gnostic♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is a fact and examples have been proven. For example, since a whale is a mammal, in theory it must have had a land dwelling ancestor. To prove the theory, a sequence of fossils documenting the change of the whale from a land dwelling creature to an aquatic one must be found in the fossil record.
Lo and behold, the evolution of the whale from a land dwelling animal to an aquatic one has been found in the fossil record.
Read some more.
2007-07-11 05:54:09 · answer #7 · answered by damnyankeega 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
"A theory by definition has to do with conjectures, hypotheses and unproven assumptions."
That is a lie.
In scientific terms a theory is 'a closely reasoned set of propositions, derived from and supported by established evidence and intended to explain certain phenomenon.'
"Evolution is not a scientific theory..."
Another lie
"Evolution and Creation are equally religious."
Yet another lie. Evolution has nothing to do with religion. Creation, however, requires a supernatural creator, so is reliant on religion.
2007-07-11 05:51:19 · answer #8 · answered by Tom :: Athier than Thou 6 · 9⤊ 1⤋
Dear Gilbert,
It's probably a good thing that you have faith in your god. Your understanding of the rest of the world is just a wee bit shaky. I'm glad you have something to fall back on.
2007-07-11 06:48:19 · answer #9 · answered by The angels have the phone box. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bible quotes reflect the intellect of ancient people who also believed that the earth was flat. Do you know how bacteria become resistant to antibiotics? They evolve. We have proof that evolution is real. Unfortunately religion can act as a blindfold.
2007-07-11 05:58:01 · answer #10 · answered by liberty11235 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I guess it's easy for you, since you just make up facts as you go along, but then again isn't that where religions come from? As for the rest of us, we require a little more proof. Evolution is not in any sort of crisis. You can't change that by typing the word FACT after your own fantasies.
2007-07-11 05:52:25 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋