ence?
I am arguing that knowledge of God is innate.
Say you are watching Game A being played on TV and you know nothing about it, not the rules, no commentary, you can't even see the score, just the action on the screen. Through simple observation could you KNOW anything about the game? If you have basic knowledge such as, time, causation, ethics, and winning, but no knowledge of Game A is correct interpretation possible? If you have knowledge of Game B and you apply its rules to Game A, is correct interpretation of Game A possible? Now, if the mind contains the right presuppositions about the universe in general (the basic categories such as time and causation) and about Game A in particular, is correct interpretation possible?
My position is that knowledge of God is innate, but due to our flawed nature we choose not to interpret the data correctly, we apply the rules for Game B to Game A. Not because we don't have the evidence but because we simply like Game B better than A.
2007-05-31
10:49:16
·
9 answers
·
asked by
HAND
5