Do you know science?
1. Astronomers observe stars and their life cycles using TELESCOPES?
2.What is the most abundant element found in the crust of the Earth? SILICON
3. It takes at least _3__ seismographs at different locations to locate earthquakes accurately.
4. A sound wave and a p-wave are both __VARIABLE____ waves.
5.Rock formations hanging from the ceiling of a limestone cave are called_STALACTITES______.
6. Varying amounts of solar radiation cause the wind patterns. Where is the solar radiation the highest? NORTH/SOUTH POLES
7.The ozone layer is important because What? BLOCKS UV RADIATION
8. Which is the most abundant gas in the atmosphere? NITROGEN
9. What type of cloud indicates precipitation? CUMULUS
10.The boundary between two different air masses is a __FRONT?____.
11.What general direction does the jet stream flow? WEST?
12.A weather condition where hot air is unable to rise is
called_______.??
13.. As heat energy is RELEASED?______, ice melts
14.
2007-05-31 11:22:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
1. Telescopes. Radio telescopes, x-ray telescopes, etc.
2. Oxygen at 46.1%
The most abundant MINERAL is silicon, but element is Oxygen.
3. 3. That's why it's called TRIangulation.
4. Pressure wave, or compressional wave.
5. Stalacites
6. Don't know. I'll guess and say the equator because the angle of the sunlight is the least, and as such is distributed to the smallest area. Why the equator is the hottest also.
7. Ozone absorbs UV radiation. This helps to stop heat from entering the atmosphere (global warming) and also shields us from UV rays which cause cancer (wear good sunscreen).
8. Nitrogen
9. Nimbostratus, although Cumulonimbus turn into big thunderstorms.
10. Front, Frontal Zone, or Frontal Transition Zone
11. West to East
12. Inversion
13. Transferred, Absorbed.
2007-05-31 11:56:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dorian Grey 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
4.Seismic waves? or is is longitudinal waves? not sure.
5. Stalactites
6. the equator, i believe
7. The ozone layer absorbs harmful incoming UV radiation
from solar energy, and thereby prevents it from reaching the earth's surface where it can initiate harmful effects on animal and plant life.
8. Nitrogen
9. cumulonimbus? i think.
10. Front
13. Absorbed....i believe.
That's the most i could answer...I'm a bit rusty on the others. lol.
~PhoeniX~
2007-05-31 11:04:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Spurious 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's something that I wonder about. How come there isn't anyone with the first name Science? I mean, if it's so great and worthy of dedication, why haven't I met someone with the first name Science? It could be a girl's name, or a boy's name.
We have the derivatives of Christian, Christina, Judah, Mohammed, etc. But no 'Sciences' walking around out there.
As to your question, I ain't even going to try. I am not a scientist, and there aren't many good ones that would hang out here!
EDIT: See?
2007-05-31 11:11:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
ok, since you missed them, that means you don't need the marks anymore so I'll give it a shot - (Phoenix looks to have the best answer though....)
1) unicycles
2) atheists
3) IDK, 114? (hey I'm being honest)
4) surfable
5) undeniably precarious
6) in the steeples of Christian churches
7) I wouldn't get good reception if it wasn't there
8) whichever person is screaming the most in earnest that they are right (at the time of course)
9) the darkest one :)
10) whoever draws it
11) whichever way the wind is blowing (see question 8)
12) depressed silence from the congregation
13) increased (this one actually might be right)
thanks for the fun.... JK of course
love and blessings :)
2007-05-31 11:18:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Scientists" attack Christianity and "Christians" attack technology. How can technology be used to purpose non-repeatable phenomena. Did "guy" exist 7,000 years in the past? It relies upon on the variety you outline "guy." in case you outline "guy" as somebody who can record heritage, the respond must be "no." whilst i replaced into attending college, an prolonged time in the past, C-14 dating replaced into stated as an "absolute" dating approach and limited to 50,000 years in the past. Now it is seen a relative dating gadget. It has alway been considered as such by physicists and extends previous 60,000 years. C14 is created by bombarding the nitrogen loose on the suitable of the ambience with cosmic capability. If there is far less loose nitrogen, there is far less C14 created. much less C14 in an merchandise shows an older age. technology does not attack something. the 2d it does, it ceases to be technology. Scientists who take aspects like which will become clergymen of "technology" fairly than observers of experiments and technology is all approximately repeatable technology. right here is the weak spot of all dating structures. no person has ever examined them for 2 hundred,000 years... or maybe 60,000 years. the thought the forces that govern those structures are static is without data. Even the belief of time has its limits. without mass/gravity, time does not exist, in accordance ot Steven Hawkings. yet, then, the Biblical dating is likewise in keeping with assumptions by some nineteenth century bishop. How long is an afternoon if the earth does not rotate on the priority of the solar... or if there is no solar. Then there is the project of randomness. If a pail of ice all at once started out to boil, could it is a miracle or an accident of danger? technology could say it replaced into an accident of danger probably in elementary terms to take place as quickly as in one thousand billion trillion buckets of ice. quicker or later, that that's danger and that that's supernatural attain a nexus.
2016-12-12 07:50:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Firstly, you're in the religion section.
Secondly, read a book or look the answers up on the net. Having someone just tell you the answer won't teach you anything.
2007-05-31 11:02:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by swordarkeereon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't been in an earth science class for quite a while now, but I can tell you that #8 is nitrogen.
2007-05-31 10:57:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try reading your course manual - thats why you missed all those simple questions on a test....you have the answers, and you will learn NOTHING if you have everyone else answer them for you.
2007-05-31 11:00:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Athiests_are_dumb 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
None of these questions are in my creation science book...but just answer God did it and that should be good enough - it got me a full scholarship to Liberty U!
joking..i went to a REAL university
2007-05-31 11:01:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋