I find it strange that, just because a person happens to not believe in God, it is assumed that they do not have morals. Being a Christian, last I heard, did not require a standard. All it requires is a belief that Jesus Christ was indeed the Son of God, that He died in our place to save us from ourselves, and that we do what we can to live positive, loving lives in service to mankind. That's about it. Perfection, unless I am mistaken, was not a requirement. We're all screw-ups. None of us is perfect, no matter what we might think.
I just don't understand why it is assumed that a person's path is WHO they are. To me, it just means that this is the point they are at in their journey. We all have our journey to make, and Christians are supposed to help one another along it. Why the scorn? Why is this assumption automatic, that they must be immoral without adherence to one particular brand of God or another?
2007-05-06
11:00:40
·
4 answers
·
asked by
intuition897
4