Well, I believe in the personal freedoms of everyone, and I believe that if they place is privately owned they can run it as they wish. However, since this is supposed to be geared in a scientific context to the general public, most importantly children, I am divided on where my conclusive point of view on this should stand. Should they be required to have a disclaimer saying "this is rejected by most of the scientifict community"? I don't know. Of course Christians will jump and say "IT IS SCIENTIFIC. NO DISCLAIMER. YOU HAVEN'T FOUND YOUR MONKEY PERSON." But honestly, should this, regardless of your religious point of view, be presented as SCIENCE when MOST SCIENTISTS agree it isn't?
For Christians that want no disclaimer: Would you be okay if say the Raliens (people that believe aliens made us) had their own "scientific" musem open to children without a disclaimer saying it isn't endorsed as science by most scientists?
2007-01-13
00:19:34
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Alucard
4