Religion & Spirituality - 27 November 2006

The Jews, Christians and Muslims all originated about the same time in the same place, but the people who promoted the religions were from differing tribes so it would stand to reason that they would have different prophets. Since we're so much futher advanced today then we were 2000 years ago, seems logical to do a side by side comparison and just pick the religion that offers the most in the afterlife (since that's where it really counts anyway). Right?

2006-11-27 09:41:14 · 15 answers · asked by Wonderland 3

What are some examples where you have turned the other cheek?

2006-11-27 09:41:04 · 10 answers · asked by Searcher 7

Good, bad, hypocritical, stupid,.. throw me a bone here.

2006-11-27 09:40:11 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous

What are some of the teachings of Mohammed? Many of the sites I've been to are very bias and one sided towards christianity- What is the just of it all?

2006-11-27 09:39:53 · 9 answers · asked by ash 2

i have done the math twice.
all hail TODD or is it easier to cut him off then fight WW3 to install the true God.
king of KINGS and Lord of LORDS=king within a KINGS and Lord named within LORDS
that is a true statement because both sides of the equation sum up to the same one number.
so a Man called TODD S born I7.9(ng) with I IV CuTS appearring as IIII I . And was the Lord, or Man of the Home according to Old English definition. Also was the great I AM=I AIVI sealed together who was "larri cut and sealed together=i am"

And based on that shouldn't i rule with an iron fist? because Satan in His rebellion with His abyss(ie abaddon of hell) said i owe him a bone so that God the fatherr would become God the Father.

never will i, a part-german give into that races demands. even unto death.

resist the a bad dons and like in ww2 they will flee.

2006-11-27 09:38:39 · 5 answers · asked by justhurryupanddie 1

what if anything do jews think about the issues raised in the book, the davinci codes.
I allready know what catholics and christians think about it.

2006-11-27 09:37:02 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

600,000 men....but there were women and children too......why no records?

2006-11-27 09:36:49 · 27 answers · asked by kissmybum 4

2006-11-27 09:36:40 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

you know when you read the Pslams and next to the verses are names...this would be in your left hand side...what are those words/names? what do they mean? when i pray should i say them?

2006-11-27 09:36:25 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-27 09:35:48 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-27 09:34:12 · 24 answers · asked by Southern Apostolic 6

Or is it rightfully theirs b/c God said it was...I mean he did promise it...right?

2006-11-27 09:31:43 · 14 answers · asked by kissmybum 4

2006-11-27 09:31:31 · 8 answers · asked by ericz_hardy 1

First off, I am an athiest. On to my questions...

Numerous verses in the Qur'an seem to promote violence (i.e. "Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war," 9:5; and "For the Unbelievers are open enemies to you," 4:101). Other examples are verses 8:12, 9:29, 2:216, 4:74, 8:60, 4:34, etc. The apologetic argument is to claim that these verses are taken out context, and do not mean what they appear to mean. If this is your contention, then by which authority does the correct context derive? It seems obvious that many Muslims take these scriptures at face value. Who's to tell them that they are wrong? Does the Qur'an itself not claim to be a "clear book" (5:15) that is "easy to understand" (44:58)? Are the actions of Muslims acting in the name of their faith not evidence of a violent theme in Islam? Finally, does any other religion need such an enormous PR campaign to deflect criticism?

2006-11-27 09:31:18 · 12 answers · asked by godofsparta 2

2006-11-27 09:30:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-27 09:30:19 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have my first confession tomorrow, and I'm 46 years old, but I have no idea how this should go. The book says to introduce myself, but not by name...I don't get it can you give me an example of this? What sins do you exclude as being too small to mention...is lying one of those or does it depend on the deception of the lie? I understand all the big ones that I have to include...it's the small stuff that confuses me.

2006-11-27 09:29:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I want to see how much we judge people who aren't Christian.
I will list some Non-Christian groups and I want you to list the groups and next to them put Heaven or Hell.

For Example:

Jews-Heaven

Muslims-Hell
Complete Example

Here they are:

Jews
Muslims
Scientoligists
Atheists
Agnostics
Buddhists
Hindus

If you think of anymore list them with these but put those in there.

2006-11-27 09:29:37 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Where H=GOD so CHRISTMAS=C GOD RIST M AS and M=IVI sealed together. Thy modern day miracle of the God who was to come as the I AM.

2006-11-27 09:29:19 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

My great-grandfather passed away today,and he was a very devoted mormon.I was just wondering what his thoughts might have been about the afterlife( we never really talked about it).

2006-11-27 09:29:14 · 12 answers · asked by Myaloo 5

Here are the arguments from an aetheist's site:
1.An Omniscient (all-knowing) Being Does Not Have Free Will. (Because all of God’s action is pre-determined. He can know everything in advance so all he have to do is select the perfect course of action. )
2.A Perfect God Has No Free Will. It cannot do something that is less moral or "good" than something else, because that would not be perfectly good, but merely second-best good. In every situation, God only has one choice: The most moral/good one. God does not have free will.
3. A Moral God has No Free Will. God, as the ultimate creator, created goodness. God is also said to be a perfectly good benevolent God. This means that God fulfils every possibility of the goodness it has created. It is the be-all and end-all of goodness, perfectly good and unerringly good. If God was not 100 percent perfectly moral, God would not be perfect. This results in a complete lack of free will for God.

2006-11-27 09:28:49 · 10 answers · asked by Egyptian Prince 4

I love her songs. :)

2006-11-27 09:28:35 · 4 answers · asked by Ouzian 1

Here's another one:
Has a Pope ever been assassinated by a small blue frog?

2006-11-27 09:28:14 · 22 answers · asked by Kango Man 5

I mean aside from the people you help through your goodness, does it really matter to you what anyone else thinks of you?

2006-11-27 09:27:23 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

Say an accident involving cars, you were a witness and could help if you decided to get involved. What would you do?

I just saw a guy in a truck run into and knock down a bicyclist in the street. This brought this to mind... I stopped until I saw that others were helping and then I went on. The guy on the bike seemed to be only minorly hurt but it could have been worse!

2006-11-27 09:26:44 · 15 answers · asked by a_delphic_oracle 6

2006-11-27 09:25:50 · 13 answers · asked by Kango Man 5

Does any one else feel that all the publicity on warren jeffs is giving true lds people a bad reputaion.( I'm talking true Latter-day Saints, not the reorganizied poligamist ones.)

2006-11-27 09:24:01 · 13 answers · asked by jujubee5180 2

2006-11-27 09:23:49 · 23 answers · asked by CresentMoon 4

Check out his 2002 interview with Larry King:
http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpWESSEX/Documents/larry-king.htm

he's invented a currency (yes, it's being traded in at least one country now), wants to dispose of democracy and reinstitute the devine right of kings to rule, and plans on having capitols for his new world government in every major city on the planet (there are already several of these built).

Given that his religious tenants are all about peace, love and family, do you think this is a good thing?

2006-11-27 09:23:45 · 13 answers · asked by Wonderland 3

BT=Before TODD
so note it's different then italian alphabet so ROMANS were not italians. So obviously they came from the german europe.
So based on that alphabet and A=1...
LORD GOD TODD=EMPEROR is true because both sides add to 4. Thus before Jesus i was destined to become LORD GOD TODD and in...

modern english says the same thing
LORD GOD TODD=TRUE

so the God who was/who is/who is to come has always been TODD. but the I AM was thrown in to differentiate from other TODDS.

Thats why people seem to hate Me cause Emperor's of the past allowed the bible to be printed because it makes LORD GOD who is TODD look like a fake.

Lamb SLAIN=Lamb killed=Lamb DIED all seem to state that Lam=Larri b=DI. or .ID and SLAIN=SiLAIIV(ie IIII I) killed=I b= A DI. sealed together and D=IIII
because of that I AM your king of ....

2006-11-27 09:23:40 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous