An "absolute" refers to some kind of standard by which we understand or judge something as being either true/false, right/wrong, black/white, hot/cold, helpful/harmful, etc.
The atheist's claim to be able to "absolutes" without God rests upon a very basic error in logic. He has switched the meaning of the word "absolutes" without mentioning this to the theist. The so-called "absolutes" of the atheist are finite, cultural, subjective, imperfect, mutable and temporal. This is, of course, a contradiction of terms because the atheist's "absolute" is a non-absolute!
Such relative "absolutes" would be useless so far as ethics is concerned because we can make up whatever so-called "absolutes" Thus the so-called "absolutes" of the atheist are only the subjective projections of his personal feelings, ideas, biases, etc.
2006-09-29
08:39:54
·
16 answers
·
asked by
heresyhunter@sbcglobal.net
4