With regard to the applicability of Old Testament Laws to modern christianity, this answer seemed most honest to me:
"I'll just answer the best I can, I'm no expert... Yes, we disagree on it, that's why there are sub-sections of Christianity. The only explanation is that people believe what they believe, and that's that... It's the same reason that there are different religions, I guess." by pseudonym [sic]
This strikes me as a very honest answer, and one that makes a lot of sense to me.
Christians, is she correct?
If so, why did people attack me for asking about the contradictions between christian belief systems and just openly and honestly acknowledge them the way that pseudonym did?
Instead of killing the messenger, wouldn't honesty have been the best policy?
Wouldn't that have been the Christ-like thing to do?
PS: pseudonym, you have the Best Answer, once i can credit you with it.
2006-08-29
15:18:00
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous