Further, why was Seth given to Adam and Eve as a replacement for Abel? In other words, why did Abel need to be "replaced"?
(Remember, in their reckoning, only the first-born male was significant. Traditionalists tell us that Cain was Adam's first-born, and Abel was his second son.)
This has to do with what REALLY occurred in the Garden of Eden, and the enmity between the seedlines. First correct answer on both questions wins the prize! (10 points)
One more thing to keep in mind... historically, a number of "sons" did really bad things, but it never cut a person out of a genealogy. Good or bad, if a person is your kid, they're your kid. Period! Your genetics and your lineage do not change because you kill your brother.
Second-born kids need no replacement. You can have 10 more kids, it won't matter. A second-born son is not significant in determining the genealogical path of a bloodline. And yet God sent Seth to replace Abel. Why?
Good luck!
(2nd posting)
2006-08-25
04:42:26
·
8 answers
·
asked by
newhebrew1964
3