So many claim on here that there is no proof that the bible is based on facts. They claim this because they say there is no tangible proof. (Really because they wern't there and because they haven't experienced anything similar).
Why is it that you doubt a book that was written 2000 years plus ago?
That's like saying that 2000 years from now, people will deny the dictionary and claim it as a piece of fiction because they wern't there when it was written.
If athiest's follow their logic.. why would they believe that George Washington, or Pharoh's of Egypt, or anyone else before they were born ever existed?
I know I know, your going to argue that there is tangible proof with the Pyramids, etc.. but there is proof with the bible too..
Arc of the covenant, the remains of the cross, the DNA, and human remains of a whole slew of people...
Rude answers need not bother..... you will be reported
2006-08-21
00:42:16
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous