Come on, now. How hard can it be to believe that the Bible was written by men with a primitive understanding of the Universe. I'm sure they tried to write it as accurately as they could, but sooner or later, a man from the BC era is going to reach a concept that, quite frankly, they didn't have the knowledge to explain using the kind of words a Harvard graduate might use.
Is it totally unplausible that a dragon, angel, or many of the other references mentioned in the Bible that sound outright preposterous were actually colorful, artistic references to something like poverty, violence, kindness, or the ability to solve problems? I don't know if you noticed this, but everybody used to talk like that back then. In such a primitive world, I'll bet any totally logical and anylitical works of literature sounded pretty boring. Who the Hell wants to sit around the campfire and read a map or an almanac?
The inability to appreciate and interpret art is a sign of mental weakness.
2006-08-14
11:19:49
·
25 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous