Let's say that there was a great historian and explorer who was on the evening news one night claiming something amazing.
He says excitedly that, in his travels around the world, he found a lost underground city that is a place of wonders. It will change the face of history as we know it, alter our lives, and is the most magnificent thing he has ever seen. The thought of this place he found brings him to tears.
Unfortunately, he has no photographs, video, eye witness testimony from his colleagues (he found it by himself), artifacts, or anything else from this city. Some of the people in the audience think that sounds silly and don't believe him.
The real kicker is this: Instead of working to prove that this amazing claim is the truth, he challenges everyone in the audience and everyone watching on television to prove to HIM that his city doesn't exist. If they can't, then of course that means that he is telling the truth.
What would you think of that?
2007-11-15
06:26:54
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality