When non-believers like me question Christians about why it is that God allows so much suffering, Christians often state that it is because God gave man freewill. Therefore, man can choose to follow God and do what is right, which leads to heaven, or he can choose evil, which leads to damnation. I believe that the freewill argument is insufficient in explaining the suffering of innocent people. For example, suppose that a man is considering whether or not to break into a house, kidnap a little girl, and rape her. At that point, an all-knowing God would know this man’s thoughts. Therefore, when the man makes the decision in his mind that he is going to go through with the act, an all-knowing God would know it. When the man drives to the house and begins breaking in, the man has used his freewill to begin what will be a horrible act. Why could God, at that point, not turn the man into a pillar of salt, cause him to die instantly, or at least cause him to change his mind? This would not affect the man’s freewill. He would have already used his freewill to begin the act. Any answers to this other than “God works in mysterious ways” or “God has a greater plan?” These are the 3 Great Christian cop-out arguments.
2007-11-07
02:52:13
·
20 answers
·
asked by
Biggus Dickus
3
in
Religion & Spirituality