By now, many of you are seasoned veterans of the Answers R&S section. We've all seen how theists and atheists alike can ignite a debate with a simple question, a statement in the form of a question, or in a response to someone else's response.
Do you perceive that there is some kind of gnostic double-standard at work here? Is what's good enough for the goose good enough for the gander?
Is it fair for an inflammatory remark to be pounced upon by one's detractors? Is it fair that those making inflammatory remarks get pounced? Is it fair for any of them to cry "foul"?
Is it a case of "an eye for an eye", not "turning the other cheeck", "survival of the fittest", or a war of intellect?
Does anyone take a step back and think, "Okay. That person is wrong. I'm right, but they're just not worth the effort. They'll never change."?
2006-07-11
13:04:54
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality