I have read that research and scientific studies have proved circumcision lowers the risk of contracting AIDS-HIV and other STD's, however some people insist these studies are flawed, without providing any consistent evidence to support their claims. Now even at the American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) are discussing if it is suitable to change their policy on circumcision and support it again for all newborns.
So in spite of all evidences, why some people insist circumcision is not beneficial and is wrong and consider it a mutilation or child abuse?
What might be their *real* motivation for doing this?
Who is behind them, supporting and backing them?
Are they really succeeding in their cause?
Why do their speech and methods become harassing and harsh at times?
I have come across with facts provided by anti-circumcision groups that are clearly misleading and incorrect, even to someone like me, who is not a specialist on the topic.
Do they produce this wrong information on purpose? If so, why?
Why do they want to manipulate the general public?
Anyone has answers to these questions? Help please!
2006-11-26
02:13:32
·
22 answers
·
asked by
amaya d
1