This is coming from someone who has neither had children or really been around them, so I'm just curious.
It seems like most people refer to young children's ages in months, rather than years, calling them an 18 month old or a 22 month old, for example.
I understand the need to differentiate between, say, a 13 month old and a 20 month old, because of the vast amount of mental and physical development that would occur during that time period. But, I've known people to carry it out quite a bit further than that, and refer to their children as 40 month olds. To me, figuring out how old a 40 month old would be is like trying to figure out military time. (Although I suppose to someone used to military time, it would be easy. Am I just an outsider?)
Wouldn't it be just as logical to say that your child is two and a half, rather than 30 months? I wouldn't say I'd worked at a job for 30 months, I'd say I'd been there two and a half years. It just seems less awkward.
Insight?
2006-12-27
12:43:00
·
11 answers
·
asked by
xxandra
5
in
Parenting