Politics - 21 December 2007

2007-12-21 12:18:17 · 13 answers · asked by Gator 6

Please, i need it for school.
Any facts, reasons, and opinions would be great.
Thank you

2007-12-21 12:02:42 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

because "IT WILL SAVE AMERICAN LIVES".

It seams thats the only presidential prerequisite for party line loyalty. He has a free pass to do whatever so long as the reason is to "Save american lives"

2007-12-21 11:55:51 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 11:44:06 · 13 answers · asked by Gator 6

Jose A. Rodriguez Jr. He is the man, according to recent press reports, who ordered the destruction of interrogation tapes made by the CIA, which allegedly show the effects of waterboarding and other "enhanced interrogation techniques" used against terrorists Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. In the next few months, his name will likely be dragged through the mud, and he will be vilified as a rogue official engaged in a massive cover-up. I think he deserves a medal.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/LindaChavez/2007/12/21/destroying_cia_tapes_deserves_a_thank_you

2007-12-21 11:30:19 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Rice: US has 'no permanent enemies' By MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Friday held out the prospect of improved relations with the remaining two members of President Bush's "axis of evil," Iran and North Korea, as long as they meet international demands over their nuclear programs. Rice said the Bush administration in its remaining year would welcome fundamental changes in its dealings with the two countries, as well as with Syria, and as an example pointed to warming ties with Libya, which renounced weapons of mass destruction in 2003.


"The United States doesn't have permanent enemies, we're too great a country for that," she told reporters at a State Department press conference.

----------------------------------------
er ah - what? hahahaahha
Is she for real or living in a dream world?

2007-12-21 11:26:30 · 6 answers · asked by rare2findd 6

Then why in the debates do Republicans argue who is most conservative and dems argue that they are the least liberal?
Because conservatism wins every time.

2007-12-21 11:25:34 · 11 answers · asked by Brandon A 5

http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?DEPARTMENT_ID=6&SUBDEPARTMENT_ID=23&ITEM_ID=2116
Won't be long now we'll have a new currency and the Petrol Dollar will no longer be in jeopardy.
Are you excited ?????

2007-12-21 11:08:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Could it be the skeletons in their closet whispering in their ear?

2007-12-21 10:59:19 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 10:48:22 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59310

2007-12-21 10:38:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59310

2007-12-21 10:36:59 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

He denies the holocaust, he wants isreal destroyed

The population of Isreal is 6 million
The number of jews killed in the holocuast 6 million

Lets stop him NOW.

2007-12-21 10:33:20 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

because of boron mining?

2007-12-21 10:31:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I always enjoy people who equate socialism with communism. According to these... uneducated people... Canada, France, Britian, Scandinavian countries, etc. are all communist if we follow their definition. Why must these people blatantly refute anything that is socialized? Many social programs are great! They are helpful answers to people who are in need, although they do get taken advantage of far more than they should.

I can atleast give credit to those people who claim that socialism is one step close to communism, as, in theory, it probably is... but I disagree that it will actually lead to communism.

I know the differences between something socialized, and communism. What does everyone else think? Be sure to justify your answers with more than just an opinion.. such as.. sources? Points go to those who use RELIABLE sources. :)

2007-12-21 10:19:17 · 8 answers · asked by ulri6129 3

They needed a study for this?

I could have told them for free.

2007-12-21 10:10:31 · 11 answers · asked by Bubba 6

Aired in March 2001 on FOX :
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8837526437886128709&q=the+lone+gunman&total=207&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1

2007-12-21 10:08:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

2007-12-21 10:03:11 · 10 answers · asked by Locutus1of1 5

YES, NO, WHY?

2007-12-21 10:02:16 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

As Congress flees Washington for the Christmas break, it is time to issue report cards for the new Democratic leadership. We could be generous and give them an “Incomplete” but an “F” would be more accurate.

Most striking was the Democrats utter failure to live up to the key promise of their 2006 campaign: “ending the war in Iraq.”

Guantanamo remains open and operational - F.

Federal funding of embryonic stem cell research - F.

Elimination of secret ballots for union elections - F.

Even the pettiest of goals --working five days a week -- could not be achieved - F.

Wouldn't pass an immigration bill - F.

Didn't secure the borders - F.

Voting rights for District of Columbia - F.

Renewed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act , after promising that they would not - F.

Unsuccessful in achieving items both small and large on their agenda - F.

This was not what the Democrats had in mind - or promised their Leftwing base.

2007-12-21 09:48:28 · 16 answers · asked by Bubba 6

2007-12-21 09:40:37 · 4 answers · asked by madpassion 3

.....will someone on the government dole come over to mow my lawn and do the laundry?

2007-12-21 09:39:32 · 6 answers · asked by leo080564 1

According to the US government, the best way to do this, apparently, is to bomb countries from 25,000ft, capture people off the street from around the world (from Africa, not just Iraq/Afghanistan) , lock them up in Guantanemo without trial or representation becuse they are 'obviously guilty' and don't need to be tried, and finally, torture people and destroy the tapes afterwards. Also why do they only pick on countries that don't stand a chance against them?

2007-12-21 09:38:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 09:37:45 · 8 answers · asked by cody t 1

Verses letting him continue down the path of dictatorship?

There are plenty of points in at least 4 Acts that have been passed since he has been in office which literally give him unlimited power to do what HE wants to Americans. I am not making this up, it is in the government papers for everyone to see...but I am not going to list them because, although it backs my question, it is not what the question is ultimately about.

It is about what makes a patriot and what doesn't.

2007-12-21 09:37:15 · 7 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6

There is no way he could be envolved.

2007-12-21 09:34:46 · 11 answers · asked by whirling W dervish 2

Why does the government have mountains of marriage law books and bloated bureaucrats sitting around wasting tax payer money on governmental marriage administration? If two people want something beyond a spiritual union, why can't they just enter into a business partnership within the free market? Government please get out of my personal life?!

2007-12-21 09:31:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Listen to the 9/11 clues in an "X-Files" episode, and in a
"Simpsons" episode, broadcasted months before 9/11...

Let me know what you think...

http://infowars.net/articles/december2007/211207Know.htm

Then take a look at the following websites:

Watch "9/11 Mysteries" (all 3 parts)

http://www.911weknow.com

http://www.ae911truth.org

http://www.belowgroundsurface.org

http://www.truth911.net

2007-12-21 09:30:19 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-21 09:20:43 · 19 answers · asked by AB17 4

I'm referring to behaviors that go against "traditional values," not actual crimes with victims. I don't see how the bloated government having involvment in this is anything other than fascism?

2007-12-21 09:14:52 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous