Politics - 9 October 2007

Don't they realize I could care less about them and this country.

I hate them so much.

2007-10-09 05:25:37 · 14 answers · asked by Nyghtmare 2

2007-10-09 05:21:43 · 10 answers · asked by Spartacus 3

I don't deny there are liberals outside of the mainstream who would want to take away gun rights.

Mainstream liberals do not.

Is it just an extreme of conservatives who believe that all liberals want to do this? Do mainstream conservatives understand that mainstream liberals don't want to do that?

I think the biggest problem in America is that there are fringes on both sides that politicans are pandering too and they paint the other sides fringe as the other sides mainstream.

2007-10-09 05:16:54 · 14 answers · asked by Spartacus 3

I certainly am, I feel in order to combat far left Candidates like Hillary & Edwards, they're swinging way too right.
Who's speaking for moderate Conservatives?,
& Democrats for that matter?

2007-10-09 05:15:40 · 30 answers · asked by Diamond24 5

... against the black man in this case.

Thomas supposedly committed a CIVIL violation by saying "pubic hair."

Clinton supposedly raped Juanita Broaddrick and Molested Kahtleen Wiley. Those are CRIMINAL FELONIES --- not civil violations.

Why do Dems love Clinton to no end but get spew hatred at Thomas, who is accused of a far less serious offense?

2007-10-09 05:15:06 · 8 answers · asked by Duminos 2

They went after Michael J. Fox. They went after a wounded Iraq war veteran. Now they are going after handicapped kids. There is obviously no limit to how low these people will go.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/fetid-compost-where-their-hearts-should.html

2007-10-09 05:15:04 · 10 answers · asked by captain_koyk 5

2007-10-09 05:10:38 · 17 answers · asked by Duminos 2

Certainly not the stockholders, which is pretty much anyone with a 401K. Why do hippies hate Haliburton, yet they don't care when Pelosi excludes her husband's company from the minium wage increase. Why are hippie libs so inconstitent?

2007-10-09 05:09:59 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

If they vote for him, won't they be a flip-flopper?

2007-10-09 05:09:15 · 12 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

2007-10-09 04:59:02 · 6 answers · asked by Duminos 2

2007-10-09 04:55:26 · 16 answers · asked by Steven V 3

I read now that Turkey is getting ready to chase PKK rebels back into Iraq when they attack across the Turkish border. Yet the Iraqis object to partitioning their country along ethnic lines. That means that Kurdistan is still technically part of Iraq, so shouldn't the Iraqis force the PKK to disband and lay down their weapons? If they won't or can't, shouldn't the US occupation force the issue? After all, Turkey is a NATO ally.

Or do we perhaps only use terrorism as an excuse to invade when it suits our political aims of the moment?

2007-10-09 04:55:21 · 6 answers · asked by oimwoomwio 7

He has changed them again and again, what are all of them?






















Thanks!

2007-10-09 04:52:58 · 12 answers · asked by Liz Bat 1

Here are a few reasons I can think of:

The law allows people to beat their children.
People are allowed to have guns.
There is no proper social safety net.
The ethnic make-up of the population.
The educational system.
The number of religious fundamentalists.
Free-market capitalism.
Break-down of the family and family values.
Divorce and single parents.
Pornography.
Anything I'm missing?

2007-10-09 04:42:28 · 39 answers · asked by 2kool4u 5

Native Americans migrated from Asia --- all is fair in war.

We came, we saw, we conquered. We didn't steal anything. Sure, we may have used cheap tactics - but we still won.

Why do so many contine to say that we stole this land? This world has many conquered nations --- which means that they killed Natives of that territory as well.

2007-10-09 04:42:26 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-09 04:42:22 · 11 answers · asked by Duminos 2

override the fact that he is a Republican

2007-10-09 04:39:32 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

The question comes to mind, If the USA were to be invaded, by a foreign agressor, BESIDES the military enities, who will be the most persistant CITIZEN defenders, armed and willing to go into 'battle conditions'??? Who the least willing? Grades: 1== worst, 10 = best.
1. Vets?, 2. Liberals?, 3. Consevatives?,4. Politicians?,5. Others.

2007-10-09 04:39:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

The secular atheist liberals have this funny notion that it is the Christians who are "forcing" their views on them. The truth is that it is the other way around. With the help of the ACLU, the secular, atheist liberals are doing battle with mainstream Christian America and trying to force their atheistic views on mainstream America. This is the truth!

2007-10-09 04:36:06 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-09 04:35:21 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why do you agree or disagree?

2007-10-09 04:35:20 · 11 answers · asked by Liz Bat 1

Ha, ha, maybe you all had best get an education. Allow this article to be your introductory lesson:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tina-dupuy/the-puritans-were-not-the_b_67586.html

2007-10-09 04:29:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

restoring Republican control of the congress in the 08 elections?

2007-10-09 04:22:36 · 12 answers · asked by Overt Operative 6

http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-10-09-voa14.cfm

2007-10-09 04:20:20 · 19 answers · asked by Jaime M 2

2007-10-09 04:14:21 · 10 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

2007-10-09 04:14:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Here is your format. USE IT! LOL!!!!!

2007-10-09 04:13:01 · 23 answers · asked by xenypoo 7

2007-10-09 04:12:56 · 5 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

years than anytime in the last fifty. Even with the post 9/11 spending. How is this possible with the tax cuts provided by the President?

2007-10-09 04:11:30 · 9 answers · asked by hardwoodrods 6

Tell Your Members of Congress to
Make Their Earmark Requests Public!

As reported in newspapers like USA Today, CAGW is right now waging an aggressive campaign to determine which members of Congress are willing to pay more than lip service to transparency and accountability. By letter and by phone, we have called on each member of the House and Senate to disclose the earmark requests they submitted to their respective Appropriations Committees.
To date, only 66 Representatives and two Senators have complied with our request. That’s why we need you to check here and call your elected officials if they are listed and ask them to disclose their earmark requests.
The new leadership of the 110th Congress took control in January promising the “most honest, most open, most ethical Congress in history.” We plan to hold them to their word! While House and Senate rules do not require members of Congress to make their earmark requests available to the public, Americans deserve to know on which pet projects their elected representatives would lavish their hard-earned tax dollars.


Transparency is a vital first step toward eliminating the tens of billions of dollars spent on congressional earmarks annually and ending the “culture of corruption” that earmarking breeds.
Help us promote transparency and accountability by calling your elected officials today and asking them to release their earmark requests. And then tell us whether they responded YES or NO!


CAGW is publishing the responses of members of the House and Senate on our website, as well as the lists of earmark requests provided by members.
http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=getinv_Advocacy_EarmarkDisclosureCallAlert_IssuePage
So why waste your time over which side is spending more? Why not take the time to find out for yourselves and do something about it? I’ve placed my requests because I WANT to know. Will you?

2007-10-09 04:10:58 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous