They went after Michael J. Fox. They went after a wounded Iraq war veteran. Now they are going after handicapped kids. There is obviously no limit to how low these people will go.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/fetid-compost-where-their-hearts-should.html
2007-10-09 05:15:04 · 10 answers · asked by captain_koyk 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
bildymooner -- can you point out a SPECIFIC lie or are you just desperate?
2007-10-09 05:25:03 · update #1
Now what sam ba bam is saying -- THAT is a lie
2007-10-09 05:26:43 · update #2
Pfo -- as was pointed out in the blog, Having priced private insurance that would cost more than their mortgage - about $1,200 a month
Suddenly conservatives can't ADD
2007-10-09 05:32:30 · update #3
Sam Bam full of manure as usual the kids have scholarships and the family only pays $500.00 for the last 5 years the combined income of the parents hasn't exceeded $50,000.00 they paid $55,000.00 for thier house 15 years ago and it has appreciated in value and that's about it, these are the EXACT families expanded Schip was designed to help but the right doesn't want facts to get in the way of the argument as usual
2007-10-09 05:25:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because they are evil bastards who hate paying taxes. They come u with any stupid reason to not have to have taxes...here's an idea DONT GO TO WAR! We could pay for all childrens health care with the money being spent in iraq. It really could have been that simple.
Idiots.
Added: How do you think a family can live off of $45,000 a year with two children?
Whats really funny is when the dumb redneck republicans loose their jobs because they are nascar alcoholics they are first in line at the unemployment office! But oh no, dont fund social programs. YOu make no sence.
2007-10-09 05:25:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
It's easy to make an argument by putting little children in the limelight, and then decrying anyone for attacking them. Do you ever see conservatives using little kids to further their agenda? I think not.
So, according to your source, the family is not being overburdened by school costs. Apparently, they only pay $500 a year for schooling. That leaves $45,000 income left to spend on housing, clothing, food and health care. It seems to me that's doable.
2007-10-09 05:29:46 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It is the lefties that are mocking the troops in Iraq (Just as they did in Vietnam.The lefties were proud when a defenseless woman was euthanized in a manner they would never accept for a mass murder.The lefties can rewrite history to their liking and make "documentaries" that have no historical or factual backing.
2007-10-09 05:28:29 · answer #4 · answered by robert p 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
That family paid $40,000 PER YEAR TO SEND THEIR TWO 2ND GRADERS TO A PRIVATE SCHOOL.
I think they could afford to buy their own insurance for their kids.
Why are Dems focused on giving money to the RICH INSTEAD OF THE NEEDY?
Why would Dems do such a terrible job of finding a "needy" family ... instead of a family that paid $40,000 per year for private schooling?
That makes the Dems appear incompetent.
2007-10-09 05:21:22 · answer #5 · answered by Duminos 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
JACKASSES!!! That's horrible harrasing handicap kids! If i was there i'd kick there ***' so hard it would go up around their shoulders!
2007-10-09 10:28:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lies written by a left wing freak. Cant believe it but libs still think that the american people will believe anything they write.
2007-10-09 05:20:23 · answer #7 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
They all deserve to get their *sses royally kicked, especially Michelle Malkin. I'm buying unlimited drinks for anyone who slaps her!
2007-10-09 05:25:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Not sure, ask the hippies who spat on our soldiers
2007-10-09 05:18:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
No limit at all, its disgusting.
2007-10-09 05:18:31 · answer #10 · answered by Catherine1 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋