English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 29 June 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

Although is Moore's case, he is more "Gobbles" than "Goebbels"...

2007-06-29 05:48:05 · 11 answers · asked by nom de paix 4

Like he did in one of his frivolous lawsuit cases that resulted in the bankruptcy of a good doctor?

"Judging by his fundraising efforts so far, I gather most of you don't know who John Edwards is -- unless you're an overpriced hair dresser. He's the trial lawyer who pretended in court to channel the spirit of a handicapped fetus in front of illiterate jurors to scam tens of millions of dollars off of innocent doctors. According to The New York Times, Edwards told one jury: "She speaks to you through me ... And I have to tell you right now -- I didn't plan to talk about this -- right now I feel her. I feel her presence. She's inside me, and she's talking to you."

2007-06-29 05:47:12 · 6 answers · asked by Nickoo 5

require higher education and advance degrees such as computer engineering and etc. Do you think it is a good idea or a bad one. If so, why? if not, explain why not.

2007-06-29 05:46:22 · 12 answers · asked by kujiiiro 4

I have read on here about 20 times that Ann wanted John Edwards killed in a terrorist attack. Here is what she really said:

Here is my full sentence on "Good Morning America," which the media deceptively truncated, referring to a joke I told about Edwards six months ago that made liberals cry: "But about the same time, you know, Bill Maher was not joking and saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack -- so I've learned my lesson: If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."

Does that sound like she WANTED Edwards killed in a terrorist attack? Or does it sound like she was pointing out the hyprocrasy of the lefts idea that free speech only applies to them?

2007-06-29 05:44:49 · 18 answers · asked by Nickoo 5

http://www.vhl.org/newsletter/vhl2001/01bjmric.htm

http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=nr&id=753

I wonder did he show that peoples PETS were able to get treatment before suffering human beings?

Did Mr Moore view the REALCuba?
http://therealcuba.com/two_cubas.htm

Somehow I doubt it. Mr Moore is laughing his rotund belly all the way to the bank.

Suckers.

2007-06-29 05:39:51 · 18 answers · asked by fourthy27 2

I do not understand why you do not like illegal immigrants? Aren't illegal, people who came here to have a better life and that is all? I am not saying that they should come here illegally. But don't you agree that high school students should be allowed to stay here, because they have to go to college.

2007-06-29 05:34:52 · 14 answers · asked by The Calculus Alchemist 6

Isn't it possible that those who call themselves 'right wings' could, after all, be RIGHT? They surely bear the RIGHT name!!!

2007-06-29 05:25:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

BUSH passes CAFTA – We hate free trade say LIBS

CLINTON passes NAFTA – What a great president LIBS say

Unemployment Under Bush is 4.5% - LIBS say ‘worst economy ever’

Unemployment Under Clinton at same point in presidency was 4.5% - LIBS downright Giddy!

Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia – LIBS say nothing...

Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq – LIBS Cry Foul...

Bush’s dad helps him get into Yale where he is a C student – What an idiot, LIBS say

Gores DAD helps him get into Harvard where gets worse grades than Bush. Bush also has better grades than Kerry at Yale – LIBS have no problem! Just egg on their face!

Clinton dodges draft, does not serve at ALL – Who cares LIBS say

Bush spends 5 years in Guard flying Jets until HONORABLE discharge – BAD

Clinton is ACTUALLY Impeached and then ACTUALLY disbarred – No Biggy say LIBS

BUSH – Honor & Dignity back in the White House – BAD

2007-06-29 05:23:20 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-29 05:20:25 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Surely the two concepts can't go hand in hand. Pro-life is pro-life, isn't it?

Please help me with this one, I'm pulling my hair out !

2007-06-29 05:14:35 · 34 answers · asked by savs 6

"I did not have sexual relations with ... " --- President Bill Clinton

"Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons." --- Bush addressing UN in Sept 02.

Iraq has stockpiled biological and chemical weapons, and is rebuilding the facilities used to make more of those weapons."

"We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have." -- Bush Radio Address Oct 02.

"The Iraqi regime . . . possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons."

"We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, VX nerve gas." Cincinnati Ohio Speach Oct 02

2007-06-29 05:10:44 · 15 answers · asked by CuriousGuy92 3

Could it be because they treat terrorists as criminals, and use police work to stop them?

2007-06-29 05:09:17 · 21 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

In one of my answers to a previous question, I said that I wanted to join the Air Force Academy after high school because I want to serve my country. I also said if there was a draft, I wouldn't mind fighting for America against terrroism. The Democrats who answered the same question I did gave me the thumb down saying that my statement was stupid and I should die because I am a Republican. Do you think that is probrably one of the most unpatriotic things you could do: To say that me wanting to serve my country is stupid.

2007-06-29 04:57:04 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

Don't you think the terrorists want us to think we're safer and become complacent before they carry out the next one?

2007-06-29 04:53:56 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

The are advocating imposing no-fly zones in Darfur, which is an act of war. They are also advocating putting US troops in the middle of a civil war, which the Sudanese government has already said they would also consider an act of war.

So why are they advocating war and sending US troops into the middle of a civil war? All without any national interest being at stake. Does this make their criticism of Bush and Iraq hypocritical at best?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070629/pl_afp/usvote2008democratsrace_070629044527

2007-06-29 04:51:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

i need a quick "Darfur for Dummies"

2007-06-29 04:48:16 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-29 04:40:49 · 6 answers · asked by CHARITY G 7

1. Lincoln - Kept the country together/ Freed the Slaves.

2. Washington - Could have been King. Chose Democracy

3. Reagan – The Great Communicator Brought the Soviet Union to it's knees. Created 20 million new jobs.

4. Teddy Roosevelt - the first real free trader and environmentalist.

5. GWB – The Great Liberator Kept America safe from Terrorists Attacks after 9/11. Liberated 50 million hopeless Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq (Soon to be Iran)


Bottom 5

1. Woodrow Wilson - WWI was a horrible choice.

2. Andrew Johnson - Impeached

3. Carter – Soviets marching everywhere, hostages being taken, long gas lines, high interest rates and unemployment. Basically the worst parts of the Bible.

4. Clinton – The Great Fornicator Brought a 19 year old Chubby Intern to her knees, lied about it and was IMPEACHED. Then he was disbarred.

5. Millard Fillmore - As the Whig Party disintegrated in the 1850's, Fillmore refused to join the Republican Party; but, ins

2007-06-29 04:40:18 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

For anyone to assert that race is not a problem in America is to deny the reality in front of our very eyes. Hillary Clinton
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070629/pl_afp/usvote2008democratsrace_070629044527

Have African Americans remained idle, have they not made any noteable advances that would limit such a statement today.
How can we accept that African Americans are not educated, and unproductive, we can not nor can we excuse Hillary for impling that if Afican Americans were educated and prouductive, Americans can no longer reflect prejudice upon them. Hillary needs to say sorry now.

2007-06-29 04:39:58 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

that people who live in a Democracy state opinions in a political group to the extreme that they would never otherwise say in polite company. Was he right?

2007-06-29 04:27:38 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think so.

2007-06-29 04:18:44 · 22 answers · asked by John Galt 2

I'm curious to see if political affiliation affects your answer.

2007-06-29 04:09:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was very proud of Zell when he gave the keynote address at the GOP Convention.

With the Democrat Party having lurched to the extreme far left, there is no room in it for moderates like Zell any longer.

As Zell said, he didn't leave the Democrat Party, the party left him.

2007-06-29 04:09:32 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-29 04:08:41 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Liberals run the media in this country, and all the mainstream outlets ran the story on Coulter's remarks. They ignored the first part of her sentence "If Bill Maher can say he hopes that Cheney were killed in a terrorist attack..." I never saw that in any newspaper or on any TV network program. The Liberals want to discredit FOX??? It's the Liberals who twisted that story to a point where it's all over the internet about what Coulter said. Have any of you seen the actual tape? It's so out of context. She was making a point that a Liberal can say it and get away with it, but if a Conservative says the same thing...blasted. She's right. I don't even like her.

2007-06-29 03:59:57 · 25 answers · asked by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7

I don't get what the big deal is. The court only said schools cannot use race as a deciding factor for admissions. It did not say that blacks and white must be separated. Instead of busing kids all over town, just let them go to the neighborhood schools. Or, if they wish to go to other schools, they can provide their own transportation. Every one still has the right to choose a school. Its just now the schools cannot choose you based on race. So why the uproar?

2007-06-29 03:54:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers