Politics - 22 June 2007

2007-06-22 06:40:32 · 23 answers · asked by geyamala 7

2007-06-22 06:38:00 · 15 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

If Bobby and Martin were alive today and in their prime. Would you vote for them as running mates? Which one should be President? Vice-President? Your thoughts?

2007-06-22 06:37:49 · 10 answers · asked by JayJay 3

2007-06-22 06:37:09 · 6 answers · asked by Ringo G. 4

Now, I don;t think that the government should be going in and telling news networks how to run their business. That is good enough reasoning to not apporve of this measure. But why call it censorship? Nobody is getting rid of anything, just wanting MORE opinions. So, why not just call it what it is?

2007-06-22 06:36:02 · 16 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

Sad excuse for a human

2007-06-22 06:34:18 · 24 answers · asked by Grace 1

I would love to see him as our president but he's going to be 72 in 2008 and 76 at the end of his term. That is even older than Ronald Reagan, who apparently aged a lot toward the end of his term.

2007-06-22 06:27:21 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

Belief in fiscal responsibilty to serve long term goals of sensible tax reduction with a balanced budget but without politicizing the issue; using American power quite modestly and only stated as shared goals with nations less fortunate than ourselves when battling a foe; a vision of where we can be as a nation, as a world, in constructive and earnest investments shared with others on science and education projects serving mankind; a new political language accomodating "conservative" concerns on excessive social spending while showing the liberal and traditional courage to defend the down trodden when real constitutional rights are violatedor in question; to share, in appropriate ways, what is best about America, to speak of America as a beacon of light for the future, not, a defender against nations that question our motives and sympathys?

2007-06-22 06:26:36 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

who will subsidize the losses that are sustained by the stations who are forced to provide equal time to liberal views?

I don't listen to talk radio, but I also don't think that Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, and Harry Reid have any more of a right to ignore the 1st Amendment than George Bush. (Assuming you believe that the Patriot Act violates the 1st Amendment)

2007-06-22 06:26:32 · 18 answers · asked by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6

The US ranks 37th because of the uninsured's access to healthcare which is at 15% in this country. Otherwise we are the best in every category. You guys are jokes. Go and see the propaganda film Sicko and blindly follow what people tell you.

2007-06-22 06:25:07 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why only talk about the economy under Reagan from 1981-1984, and not the RECESSION that followed as a result of SS economic policy being a short term solution?

2007-06-22 06:24:35 · 8 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070622/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

2007-06-22 06:16:54 · 26 answers · asked by ? 2

2007-06-22 06:12:12 · 35 answers · asked by ? 2

I'm thinking war for profit is actually a older profession.

2007-06-22 06:11:44 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

back to the states?
What are some good examples of powers the federal government shouldnt' have?

2007-06-22 06:10:30 · 15 answers · asked by Nickoo 5

With all of these people ranting about "illegal wars," I'm curious to know what your definition of one is.

2007-06-22 06:07:22 · 20 answers · asked by Kelsey 2

2007-06-22 06:03:45 · 37 answers · asked by ? 2

Wrap your head around this one...

2007-06-22 06:02:41 · 6 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

2007-06-22 05:57:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am sick of a bunch of criminals having control over my country and taking the rights away from the American people.'

I am for:

-banning all lobbyists from Washington

-withdrawing from Iraq when Iraq within the next couple of years, and send a NATO or UN team over to stabilize the country

-shutting down the Federal Reserve

-selling all major media corporations to independently owned companies that holds no particular political position

-stopping the domination of the Democratic and Republican parties over our political system and creating one big party which is controlled by the American people and not a bunch of greedy crooks who have an agenda in mind

-putting an end to the Patriot Act

-stopping globalization, which is helping reaching the New World Order

-abolishing the system of computerized voting in every state to ensure the American people actually choose who leads the country

2007-06-22 05:56:56 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush's approval ratings just dropped another two points to an all time low of %26.
He is in Nixon territory now who was at %23 in 1974 shortly before he left office.
Even Jimmy Carter didn't drop below % 28 in 1979.

Do you think he will continue to drop in the polls?
What do you think is driving the numbers down?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19352087/site/newsweek/

2007-06-22 05:54:42 · 18 answers · asked by lightwriter 5

Far left liberals or far right conservatives?
This should be an easy question for both sides.

2007-06-22 05:48:58 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

In 1830 Mexico wanting to populate Texas offered anyone who was willing to become a Mexican citizen and convert to Catholicism 160 acres of land. President Andy Jackson sent Sam Huston with a group of immigrants for the sole purpose of taking Texas from Mexico. We all know what happened next.

2007-06-22 05:48:00 · 9 answers · asked by Dani 5

president is a Democrat they bash away at them.
Is this a sign of their hypocrisy or just delusions of grandeur?

2007-06-22 05:45:49 · 14 answers · asked by Your Teeth or Mine? 5

How can presidents keep telling people that supply side economics works, and then practice it incorrectly, creating deficits? How can you still support someone who cuts taxes, without cutting spending? I need to know how this is conservative...has supply side economics ever been practiced successfully in reallity?

2007-06-22 05:45:35 · 9 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

Real Disposable Personal Income
President Term Years In Office Real Disposable Personal Income Start Of Term (in $ billions) Real Disposable Personal Income End Of Term (in $ billions) Personal Income Growth Annualized (%) Real Disposable Personal Income Rank Average Rank
Bill Clinton 1993-2001 8 5,512 7,255 3.49 5 3.7
Ronald Reagan 1981-1989 8 3,906 5,216 3.68 4 4.

2007-06-22 05:44:18 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

That is one thing the RedsStaters have all over the Blues. They understand a war it only to help the balance sheets of the Aristocratic Military Industrial Complex.

Every dead soldier is another coffen sold to the Government.

Bullets average over one million per dead enemy. When you see a dead Iraqi that represents 1,000,000 $2.25 bullets.

War is Money Money is War

2007-06-22 05:40:15 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

And why do you think that is? A find it quite amusing that certain people are afraid they won't get an answer they like. Typical conservative action. "You're either with me or against me."

2007-06-22 05:37:22 · 41 answers · asked by Anonymous

When I click on the icon, it says page can't be displayed. Did he get reported again?

2007-06-22 05:36:54 · 9 answers · asked by Supercell 5

Are all Neocons like that????????

2007-06-22 05:29:28 · 8 answers · asked by Page 4