http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070622/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
2007-06-22 06:16:54 · 26 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Don't worry it will barely get a mention on the network news broadcasts and they certainly won't use the word terrorists.
2007-06-22 06:23:12 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 10⤊ 10⤋
I don't know why you think showing your ignorance in opposing views, but bashing them anyway, makes you look witty.
"Duh, liberals want terrorists to win! I said it, therefore it true. Hahahaha." Not wanting our own getting killed is completely different than wanting terrorists to 'win'. I was focused the whole time on going after al-Qaeda, instead of going into Iraq. Now, unfortunately, al-Qaeda is in Iraq now too (which they weren't before); but somehow you look at that like it's a good thing. "See we have to stay now 'cause al-Qaeda's there!" Yeah, great.
I'm thrilled if al-Qaeda militants are killed, what I'm not thrilled about is the 15 U.S. casualties reported this week.
2007-06-22 13:37:14 · answer #2 · answered by shelly 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When I woke up at 4 am ET, the headlines said 17 civilians killed. Now it's terrorists? Or both? Neither? It's hard to believe anything anymore, but my guess is they changed it to terrorists to make themselves look good. That's not a good day for libs, but it's certainly a bad day for anyone who wants honest reporting.
2007-06-22 13:27:32 · answer #3 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 7⤊ 4⤋
The military announced Thursday the deaths of 14 U.S. troops in Iraq, including five soldiers killed by a single roadside bomb in Northeast Baghdad.
Military spokesman Lt. Col. Lee Packnett in Baghdad told CBSNews.com that the roadside blast also left three Iraqi troops and an interpreter dead.
2007-06-22 13:25:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
How many troops were killed the last 2 days alone, George Bush just yawns, the insects have all died in his brain.
You Republicans can all day dream because you know your on your last throe, so dream on. Liberals laugh at you because your so embrassed of your party . Take a look at what your offering for the next Presidency, WHEW!!!
2007-06-22 13:34:44 · answer #5 · answered by Nicki 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'm sure they're very upset. Most lib politicians care more about the islamofascists than our own troops. It's sad.
2007-06-22 15:24:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
too bad they don't publish a list of the terrorists killed. libs would probably check it frequently for the names of friends.
2007-06-22 15:22:42 · answer #7 · answered by WJ 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They were not terrorist. They are just confused innocent muslims that needed rehab, or whatever else the liberal talking points of the day say. Jihadist are now ji-hasbeens...way to go USA.
2007-06-22 13:34:28 · answer #8 · answered by mbush40 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You should read closer, cause I didn't see the word terrorist used in that article. I think it's a good thing when people who are trying to kill US soldiers are found and taken care of.
2007-06-22 13:24:28 · answer #9 · answered by I'll Take That One! 4 · 6⤊ 5⤋
What is exactly a terrorist? Bush seems to define one. He's terrorizing America and our freedoms.
Civilians are not terrorist.
2007-06-22 14:04:53 · answer #10 · answered by Red Baron 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
bad day (or life) for anyone involved. but, can we define 'terrorist'.
2007-06-22 22:39:59 · answer #11 · answered by exo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋