Politics - 5 June 2007

Is a cheap shot at a Democrat all it takes?

2007-06-05 12:45:10 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Vote for Tom Tancredo!

2007-06-05 12:36:02 · 15 answers · asked by plezurgui 6

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070605/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq;_ylt=AleTbVNJekweDPLGdRwowO.s0NUE

Gee not even Bush's own Party can stomach the foolishness anymore. They gave him his "Surge", it failed... Now thy're "Flip-Flopping" and backing the Iraq Study Group's Recommendations.

Will Bush call them "UnAmerican" and accuse them of "emboldening the enemy"?

2007-06-05 12:32:05 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

system or goal. so no matter who you vote for the outcome is fundamentally the same, only superficialities change. is this true?

english is not my mother tounge, sorry.

2007-06-05 12:29:26 · 11 answers · asked by Lorenzo de' Medici 1

2007-06-05 12:27:00 · 12 answers · asked by me 5

Is this a UN thing? It seems odd to me that we make this something that we think we can control about other countries.

2007-06-05 12:22:16 · 13 answers · asked by BaseballGrrl 6

I sure as hell do. It's about teh only thing that I agree with the Conservatives on.

2007-06-05 12:16:49 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-05 12:09:39 · 20 answers · asked by demsareliars 1

some people will abort a baby because its handicapped in some way... didn't Hitler do that to? Abortion is murder. You might say,
the baby is not living yet... but if your mother aborted you,
you would not be here today. gone. dead.

if you disagree please tell and explain!

2007-06-05 11:55:05 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean it is absolutely ridiculous, who cares if his middle name is Hussein? It's such a trivial and pointless issue. I could just as well tie the name Hussein to the late King Hussein of Jordan, an ally of the U.S. and Israel.

Should we look at John McCain differently because he shares a first name with John Wilkes Booth?

2007-06-05 11:54:54 · 10 answers · asked by Liberals love America! 6

It seems to me that Hillary is actually quite moderate yet there are so many people talking about her as a Marxist. People will talk about Bill Clinton and his "immoral" behavior, but that wasn't Hillary she was the one who was cheated on.

Why does she make so many people angry? Is it primarily because she is female?

2007-06-05 11:53:05 · 18 answers · asked by weebee 2

This is to me disturbing. This is their reasoning. They do not want to insult or discriminate against Muslims who do not believe the Holocaust ever happened. Do you agree or disagree with their reasoning and why.

2007-06-05 11:51:54 · 26 answers · asked by LDS of Three and Loving It 3

Bush will pardon his friend Scooter Libby. Left-wingers will need to be placed in padded rooms to keep from injuring themselves during their rants.
The question: Would you pardon your friend if you had the power?
I want the president to pardon him just to stay on the last nerve of the radical left-wingers. Its amusing to watch.

post script: Yes, I know a post like this always brings out a left-winger that will tell me how wrong I am, and will produce a personal attack on me, even though they have no idea who I am...but thats part of the fun in posting it :)

2007-06-05 11:46:02 · 28 answers · asked by parrothead 2

2007-06-05 11:44:20 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is a real question. I want real answers so I can understand. This is based on Obama's statment that Black's have few hopes and few opportunities.

2007-06-05 11:44:19 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-05 11:43:14 · 18 answers · asked by Gary 2

Is it only the ideas that corrupt the human rights that give communism the bad name? i.e. China (forced abortions)

Or the biased attitudes that has developed over the ages due to the cold and vietnam wars?

Is it too do with greed of power of our dictatorships?

I just don't know what to believe

2007-06-05 11:35:42 · 33 answers · asked by bubblyfool 2

I bring up the middle name of Barack HUSSEIN Obama only because he is trying to minimize his middle name. His supporters say it is a common name in muslim culture.

Do you think this will make a certain number of americans think bad about him?

What do you think?

2007-06-05 11:28:42 · 22 answers · asked by infobrokernate 6

Hillary clinton and Barack HUSSEIN Obama voted against troop funding.

What do you think that means?
Would you vote against troop funding?

Any ideas out there?

2007-06-05 11:17:01 · 11 answers · asked by infobrokernate 6

America has socialized fire department, socialized police department, socialized schools, socialized libraries, why not socialized medicine? Don't you want America to be #1

2007-06-05 11:06:11 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-05 10:51:59 · 38 answers · asked by Sarge Boston 2

I have seen a lot of things in life, but this is just horrible. I read a question earlier that said
"How can Democrats support pro-choice, but not like the death sentence?"
She made great points! then i read some answers that pushed me over the edge. How can people sit there and say that its not murder? its just a 'fetus.' That is a poor helpless child living inside of a woman and then they want to just decide to murder her own flesh and blood. Its makes me SICK!

Then people use it as an excuse, what if she was gang banged by several men and raped...SO?!?! did that child have a choice to be born, it was not that innocent childs fault! PERIOD! a woman does not have to murder her child, it is also a part of her as well.

I don't think it should be an option to MURDER an innocent life, at all! They should go through the entire pregnancy and give it up for adoption, instead of shredding the baby by the pieces, just so that 'women' can be at piece.

ABORTION = MURDER!

2007-06-05 10:39:26 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is UNBELIEVABLE he must really scare some important people.

2007-06-05 10:32:37 · 16 answers · asked by RON PAUL for President 2008 2

2007-06-05 10:30:39 · 16 answers · asked by STJC 2

They mocked the Christian Right in the last election and their party is ANTI religion...NOT NOW! Have they all FINALLY found the Lord?

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070605132731.tsx2cr5l&show_article=1

2007-06-05 10:27:14 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

If nuclear weopens are no longer a deterrant (the shield thing kills the detterant arguement ) then won't the shield actually encourage growth of nuclear weopens production by americas enemies and (current) allies to dodge the shield, in the event of a war?

If there is a nuclear war, won't america simply have thousands upon thousands more nuclear weapons shot at it, to overwhelm the sheild?

In short... is the whole shield thing worth tearing up the quiet understanding between america and other nuke nations, while destroying the deterrant aspect of nukes (which they were designed for) and creating massive political fallout and hostility in americas friends or old adversaries - whilst also actualy raising the possibility that more nukes will fall on america?

2007-06-05 10:24:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

These Elites dont even represent the core of either partys values and leave a Grey Area of Flip Flop beliefs that the people are starting to see the and the mainstream media better realize that the so called lower tier candidates are starting to make more sense!

2007-06-05 10:19:00 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Pro-choice is what Democrats support; the right for a women to choose what she wants to do. But Democrats don't support the death penalty when someone has done something horribly wrong.
Now let's think.
They would kill an innocent baby that hasn't even been born and not have someone who went one a muder rampage killed. Yes, it does sound rather harsh, the death penatly. But that person chose what they were going to do. The baby had no choice.
Hmmmmm.

Hmmmmmmmm.

Now what do you think of Pro-choice.

I just can't believe people would rather support a baby not being alive but a criminal who's had a chance at life having that life.

:P

Sry, just had 2 say that.

2007-06-05 10:16:47 · 42 answers · asked by Ellyn 1

"Passenger Lists
Published Passenger Lists Are Missing Hijackers
According to the official story, teams of four and five Islamic hijackers took over Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93. Yet the passenger lists published by CNN and elsewhere are free of any Arab names, much less any matching the alleged hijackers. 1 2 3 4 It has been claimed that the names of the hijackers were on the airlines' flight manifests. However, there is no public evidence of this. Researchers who have attempted to obtain this information from the airlines have been rebuffed. 5
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/passengers.html

2007-06-05 10:15:12 · 2 answers · asked by andy r 3

HAMPTON, Va. - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record) said Tuesday that the Bush administration has done nothing to defuse a "quiet riot" among blacks that threatens to erupt just as riots in Los Angeles did 15 years ago.

The first-term Illinois senator said that with black people from New Orleans and the Gulf Coast still displaced 20 months after Hurricane Katrina, frustration and resentments are building explosively as they did before the 1992 riots.

"This administration was colorblind in its incompetence," Obama said at a conference of black clergy, "but the poverty and the hopelessness was there long before the hurricane.

2007-06-05 10:12:34 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous