thats all we need is President Hussein but it does rhyme with insane so it might happen.
2007-06-05 11:32:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
7⤋
Those who are his detractors will continue to emphasise what is not important thinking somehow the American public is so stupid and shallow as to us that and only that to disqualify him. Those same people don't realize for example that I can write John Sidney McCain, or Newton LeRoy Gingrich, or Willard Mitt Romney and get about the same effect. You are probably hoping people think bad about Obama because only someone who does emphasize his middle name is doing for a reason. This is an old trick by the way and most people know he is a Christian not a Muslim. People who care do research and pay attention. They know that this is a childish way to discredit someone but you keep it up and you will get people to vote for him out of spite for you. He is gaining on Hillary and so it is very possible if the momentum continues he could be the next president. What do you think about that?
2007-06-05 11:43:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Just remember, only his father was a muslim and not a very strict one either. He went to a public school that was attended by christian and muslim children. And, his mother was an atheist. Obama is a Christian and attends the UCC Congregational Church in Chicago. It's a Christian church. He's not Muslim and he's not Atheist. I find it funny that you people don't like to mention any of these facts tied to that middle name or him. Considering he's catching up to Hillary, it seems more Americans think he's a good candidate.
2007-06-05 11:46:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
simply by fact a great form of the time the persons who pass out of their thank you to deliver it up are mendacity. it incredibly is a lie of misrepresentation and of omission. They comprehend that a great form of persons could have an emotional reaction to that call and don't comprehend or do no longer care that the call is as worry-loose simply by fact the call Smith in some factors of the worldwide. As to your assertion approximately how the democrats are utilising Obama's Muslim historical past, it incredibly is in simple terms bull ****. no person has ever stated that electing Obama will reason all Muslims to "be our acquaintances". What they have stated is that his historical past provides him unique perception into the persons we are coping with, perception which could in common terms be advantageous to a president. Your form of thinking is ignorant and provincial and not interior the final pastimes of the country.
2017-01-10 14:54:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by porco 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
King Hussein of Jordan was an American ally, and the second Arab leader to forge a peace agreement with Israel.
Saddam Hussein of Iraq was installed by the U.S. CIA (he was originally recruited as an assassin in 1959), and an American ally all the way through the Reagan administration when we were supporting if not practically cheering his use of chemical weapons against internal and foreign enemies.
So what's your point?
2007-06-05 11:33:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mark P 5
·
9⤊
1⤋
Oh diddums. Petty that you bring this up constantly. Maybe RLP and the wife for 7th heaven3 would let you into their newly founded political party, here is a picture of the current members, I'll let you decide which one is RLP, etc:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8f/Ah_angeklagte.jpg
(I think the guy last on the right side is trying to cover something up with the positioning of his hand)
2007-06-05 11:41:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I do not believe any Christian would continue to carry the name of Mohammed's son after he converted.
That is why James, John, Matthew, and Luke are such popular Christian names. Would a Christian name their child Satan?
Neither would a Muslim name a child a name associated with the gospels of the bible.
Obama may not be a Muslim, but I think he is a Christian only in his campaigns.
2007-06-05 11:38:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by plezurgui 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
His middle name shouldn't even be an issue. Its ridiculous to try and make something he had no control over an issue.
His name is only an issue for people who never would have voted for him in the first place for a few other reasons. The middle name is just icing on the cake for certain people.
2007-06-05 11:32:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7
·
7⤊
2⤋
Hussein is like bob in the United States. What's your point?
2007-06-05 11:37:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, it will, but for no good reason. Can YOU tell us how his middle name is relevant to anything? What if he were a conservative with that middle name? How would the name affect your opinion then?
Do YOU think judging him for having that middle name is a legitimate judgement? DO tell how.
2007-06-05 11:41:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think people are right to be annoyed, if they're trying to have a serious political discussion and you want to have everyone focus on something so trivial and irrelevant as a middle name.
2007-06-05 11:34:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋