Politics - 13 July 2006

2006-07-13 03:18:31 · 12 answers · asked by f d 1

unlike bush and he is still in office.

2006-07-13 03:18:00 · 22 answers · asked by david c 4

Maybe some sort of United Nations thing to get rid of these aweful weapons that could kill so many people. Every sane person knows that to use them is madness, so why have them sitting around?

2006-07-13 03:17:30 · 3 answers · asked by Stan S 1

2006-07-13 03:13:12 · 11 answers · asked by Orion D 2

2006-07-13 03:11:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-13 03:03:45 · 11 answers · asked by jonnygaijin 5

2006-07-13 02:59:23 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

And perhaps an apology for nearly wiping them all out?

2006-07-13 02:59:14 · 13 answers · asked by Rob T 1

In the absence of the US, which Country would be the next SuperPower ???

Would that lead to a better world ???

2006-07-13 02:58:14 · 11 answers · asked by American Superman 3

2006-07-13 02:56:35 · 40 answers · asked by jonnygaijin 5

is there a reason

is this some kind of psuedo christian sadistic ritual that we've outlawed the world's oldest profession

prostitutes were respected in rome. those who could give good blowjobs commanded a hefty price

now society persecutes people who want to pleasure themselves outside the confines of state sanctioned marriage.

2006-07-13 02:56:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

bush can only wish he had those ratings from the american people. despite of the lewinsky scandal.

2006-07-13 02:55:33 · 21 answers · asked by david c 4

amazing. he is more incompetent then nixon.

2006-07-13 02:50:46 · 16 answers · asked by david c 4

will neo-cons, the GOP and fundies still support him and think he's the best hero since Lincoln?

2006-07-13 02:48:55 · 18 answers · asked by ceprn 6

Intern!!!!! Go Slick Willy, George W. can't hold your jock.

2006-07-13 02:46:28 · 21 answers · asked by AnswerMan 3

2006-07-13 02:45:18 · 12 answers · asked by jonnygaijin 5

2006-07-13 02:40:46 · 11 answers · asked by Stan S 1

2006-07-13 02:36:41 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-13 02:35:41 · 39 answers · asked by Anonymous

why didnt we go after saudi arabia if iraq was really about 9/11. 19 of the 20 hijackers were from saudi arabia not iraq. did bush mislead us for his personal agenda?

2006-07-13 02:34:51 · 18 answers · asked by david c 4

he mislead congress, senate, and the american people. there was no connection with bin laden or sadam. and no wmds.

2006-07-13 02:30:59 · 31 answers · asked by david c 4

2006-07-13 02:26:34 · 18 answers · asked by david c 4

someone told me that!is that true!can you believe it!?

2006-07-13 02:26:00 · 5 answers · asked by donia f 4

2006-07-13 02:19:21 · 24 answers · asked by jonnygaijin 5

Being caught lying seems to be an occupational hazard for politicians. Even if caught doing it, the consequences dont seem to be very bad for them.

2006-07-13 02:16:50 · 21 answers · asked by Nothing to say? 3

here's the deal. america is moving down while china is moving up. we're already over due for a world war to sort out the major powers. for america, the longer they wait, the worse it's gonna be taking out china.

threatening north korea, invading lebanon. bush is really pushing it now.

the chinese are playing cool. all they have to do is let america screw around in iraq a few more years and they'll be all out of gas for a war with china. US needs to force this war now while america still has an advantage over china, and get as many allies on his side as possible. particularly japan, who he's been trying to scare into re-arming by ignoring the korea situation to the point they have a nuke.

2006-07-13 02:08:41 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

More and more people embrace the leftie way of living because the man called: Bush. Are you going to be the next URSS ?

2006-07-13 02:06:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-13 02:03:24 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Europe - the cradle of modern civilization or America - the land of "the so-called freedom".

2006-07-13 01:53:03 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

The reasons we were given for rushing into Iraq were terrorist connections, treatment of the citizens and the threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction... and a lot of this was just unproven intelligence. With North Korea.. we KNOW of terrorist ties.. and we have undeniable proof that Kim Il has, and is testing Nukes... yet we're trying to be diplomatic? If we were ever justified in going into Iraq... then how can a MUCH BIGGER threat be treated so lightly?

2006-07-13 01:27:04 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous