English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

he mislead congress, senate, and the american people. there was no connection with bin laden or sadam. and no wmds.

2006-07-13 02:30:59 · 31 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government Politics

31 answers

obviously he was not alone in this agenda. he is the knight of eulogia for crying out loud (freemasonry), he is part of the covert illuminati who controls america. its all about power and money.

2006-07-13 02:47:15 · answer #1 · answered by lamialestat 3 · 0 4

as an american that is exactly what happened. by labeling it a war on terror that allows the us to invade any place that bush feels is a terror threat regardless if it is true or not. the funniest thing is that the rest of the world all thinks we agree with this but more then 2/3's of the population disagree with his policies. it is not that bin laden was involved that is up for debate he deff was but there was no connection between him and saddam. they both represented some what diff beliefs but saddam never helped bin laden. you can tell the retard bush wanted to invade iraq since when we originally went over to afghan we had the area where bin laden was surounded but then bush pulled those troops out to send them into iiraq with no evidence that there were wmds. and if you say we found them now thats great.... 5 years after we invaded the country.

2006-07-13 09:34:38 · answer #2 · answered by joker222798 2 · 0 0

In case you missed the news recently, there has been WMD found buried in Iraq.

Secondly, it's been proven to death that bin laden was involved.

Next thing you liberals will come up with is Bush masterminded 9/11.

2006-07-13 09:34:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What? you are crazy dude, no he didn't exploit 9/11 he responded. Would you rather he just sit and back and watch while we get attacked? And no he did not miss lead the U.S congress, we had reason to believe that Saddam was connected to terrorist, they are still gathering the final evidence and it WILL be known soon. Regardless of WMD or not Saddam had to be removed do to his wreck-less leadership, no human deserves to be treated the way he treated Iraq citizens, its just not right.

2006-07-13 10:30:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You conveniently forgot that Congress knew as much and also supported the decision. There was a connection, there were WMD's, if you would watch or read un-biased news once and awhile you wouldn't be exposed as an ignoramus!

2006-07-13 09:38:36 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0 0

Bush masterminded (sorry, I have to laugh when those two words are put together) 9/11. The towers were brought down by planted explosives. The entire tragedy was choreographed. These are the evildoers ruling your world.

2006-07-13 09:38:21 · answer #6 · answered by Mark 5 · 0 0

It would not be the first time in US history for it to happen. FDR needed a catalyst to incite the American people to join WWII, and the attack on Hawaii at Pearl Harbor did just that.

2006-07-13 09:42:51 · answer #7 · answered by Applecore782 5 · 0 0

of course he did.poor American be live him n he could not find his own bus sines partner Mr laden in Afghanistan.i thought he lost his business with laden n he went Iraq for new agreement with Mr Saddam.what happen?oh..... I forgot American army still there.

2006-07-13 09:37:31 · answer #8 · answered by rani 2 · 0 0

Hell Yeah!!!!
Why did he invade Iraq when they posed no threat whatsoever and were not involved with 9/11 whatsoever?
I think whoever was resposible for the attacks wanted to give America the message "LEAVE US ALONE ALREADY!!!"
They (America and the guilty party) only made it worse.

2006-07-13 09:43:18 · answer #9 · answered by roxstar56 2 · 1 0

Yes. He surrounded the country with this "aura" of fear so the citizens would support a war that has absolutely no sense in the name of America's security.

2006-07-13 09:36:54 · answer #10 · answered by Dita 5 · 0 0

If you needed a way to move into Iraq wouldnt you do the same thing. I'm not agree with him but it makes all the sense in to world.

2006-07-13 09:34:42 · answer #11 · answered by DEEJay 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers