Politics - 13 July 2006

2006-07-13 23:59:55 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-13 23:58:51 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

TINY COUNTRY DEFYING ALL THE NORMS TO FIGHT FOR THEIR CITIZENS ATTACKED PALESTINE, LEBANON,SYRIA AND WARNING IRAN- HAS NO MAJORITY IN THE PARLIAMENT AND THERE ARE SECTIONS OF PEOPLE, WHO ARE PROTESTING ON THE STREETS IN ISRAEL SHOWS THE WILLINGNESS OF THE GOVERNMENT TO FIGHT IT OUT TO LOCATE THEIR CAPTURED SOILDERS AND KILL PALESTINE TERRORISTS... WHEREAS INDIAN LEADERS ARE NOT PATRIOTS TO FIGHT FOR THE DEATH OF CITIZENS, ARMY PERSONNELS AND ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF KASHMIR. THEY ARE SO GREEDY FOR MONEY AND SENSEX, THEY WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THE KILLING AND CIVIL WAR. tODAY bANGLADESH HAS JOINED PAK, TOMORROW IT MAY BE NEPAL, DAY AFTER IT MAY BE MYNAMAR, SRILANKA, BHUTAN- WHERE THE COUNTRYMEN WILL GO.

2006-07-13 23:56:55 · 9 answers · asked by pianist 5

Why? Why not?

Can the actions of Bush be justified as well?

2006-07-13 23:56:32 · 6 answers · asked by *Samantha* 3

2006-07-13 23:50:27 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I just read a poll on Yahoo news saying 24% of you were going to vote Democrat. They said the reason was that Republican voters are not happy with the way the party is going. I ask all of you who Republicans who are not going to vote Republican to vote Libertarian. That main problem most Republicans have with the government outside of the war is big goverment. If you are trying to send a message you are not happy, the results will be the same if you vote Democrat or Libertarian; Republicans will lose and the Democrats will win. Republicans will try and adopt policies of the party they lost their voters too. I would rather have them adopt Libertarian views than become Democrats.

2006-07-13 23:49:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-13 23:49:28 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please explain your answer.

2006-07-13 23:42:38 · 7 answers · asked by Burnt Emberes 3

I think not

2006-07-13 23:41:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-13 23:40:15 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

The world today is a hotbed of differing political ideologies, cultures and ambitions..... many of which are competing for power. Please explain why you feel a specific country is the most dangerous and what you believe the country is planning.

2006-07-13 23:37:19 · 10 answers · asked by ofthehighest 1

2006-07-13 23:14:01 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-13 23:06:56 · 5 answers · asked by Cool 1

Just briefly looking over the Yahoo News, i came upon this quote:

''Justice Minister Hamon Ramon told army radio Israel would fight Hezbollah with the "same means used by the Americans against Osama bin Laden," the leader of Al-Qaeda, or employed by the Russians against "Chechen terrorists''

Excuse me if im wrong, but isn't the Russian conflict with the Chechens one of the worst cases of human rights abuses in the modern world? Is Israel admiting it will consider ethnic cleansing and indiscriminate killing of civilians, or was it simply a terrible choice of words?

2006-07-13 23:03:21 · 10 answers · asked by thomas p 5

Why is it that Israel can at anytime, anywhere, just bomb a souvereign country like Lebanon, just because two of its soldiers got captured by Hezbollah? I am not saying Israel hasn't got the right to protect itself, but then, I don't think there was a declaration of war on Israel by the Lebanese govt. You just can't bomb another country just because you feel you are superior and God's chosen people, without considering the resultant effects on the civilian population. The Israelis have killed even tourists /4 member family from Brazil/, and I think they have added another anti-Israeli sentiments as a result. Bravo!
What proof has the Israeli govt. got that the Lebanese govt. was behind the killings and kidnappings of the 8 or 2 soldiers respectively? Because they suspect so?
Why doesn't the Arab nations raise their voices in as a chorus and protest this?
I think the Arabs have the right to say that with the help of America, the West is out to destroy them. Am I not right? Any justice?

2006-07-13 22:47:28 · 19 answers · asked by philip y 2

2006-07-13 22:42:37 · 6 answers · asked by Pishisauraus 3

This is what the Israeli's have been up to, ever since 1955:-

http://www.action-for-un-renewal.org.uk/pages/isreal_un_resolutions.htm

2006-07-13 22:41:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

If the theory is correct about Bushs' motivation about the war on terrorism was oil driven since he has ties to the oil industry, would america be in Iraq right now if Al Gore won that close presidential race?? I dont believe so. It goes to show how voting is very important.

2006-07-13 22:36:50 · 15 answers · asked by randyvous75 3

2006-07-13 22:35:57 · 5 answers · asked by thepaxilman 2

2006-07-13 22:21:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-13 21:54:03 · 16 answers · asked by philip y 2

Source CNN: Zarqawi (who had ties with Al-Quaida)recieved medical treatment in a Baghdad hospital after being wounded while fighting American forces in Afghanistan.(this occured before the coalitions invasion of Iraq in 2003)
Source:Hannity and Colmes:THE FORMER IRAQI REGIME OF Saddam Hussein trained thousands of radical Islamic terrorists from the region at camps in Iraq over the four years immediately preceding the U.S. invasion The existence and character of these documents has been confirmed to THE WEEKLY STANDARD by eleven U.S. government officials.

The secret training took place primarily at three camps--in Samarra, Ramadi, and Salman Pak--and was directed by elite Iraqi military units. Interviews by U.S. government interrogators with Iraqi regime officials and military leaders corroborate the documentary evidence. Many of the fighters were drawn from terrorist groups in northern Africa with close ties to al Qaeda.

The truth comes out in the wash.

2006-07-13 21:19:57 · 10 answers · asked by isaac a 3

China vetoes resolutions related to North Korea, Russia vetoes resolutions related to Iran, the US vetoes resolutions related to Israel.

I would say that these superpowers are preventing the Security council from doing it's job. Would agree?

What would be the best solution to this problem?

2006-07-13 21:11:56 · 23 answers · asked by Mohammed R 4

For instance, why do they need such big engines in their cars and then moan when they are charged $3 a gallon for petrol (gas)when the rest of the world lives with much higher prices.
Also why can't they speak English properly?

2006-07-13 20:48:45 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

the President of the United States of America? why is he introduced as the President of the United States? why is America left off?

2006-07-13 20:42:46 · 7 answers · asked by krisidious 2

2006-07-13 20:40:36 · 27 answers · asked by krisidious 2

look for yourself-- its right on our government website---scary

2006-07-13 20:21:32 · 6 answers · asked by foolio4000 1

2006-07-13 20:21:31 · 14 answers · asked by p 1

2006-07-13 20:20:13 · 8 answers · asked by p 1

i hate george bush he's so stupid it seems like he's a retard

2006-07-13 20:18:28 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous