Other - Politics & Government - July 2007

2007-07-07 13:38:56 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Honest to God. Liberals are just plain nuts. Don't they ever get embarrassed by their buffoonery? If we ignore them, will they go away? PLEASE?!?!?!

2007-07-07 13:13:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-07 13:06:28 · 16 answers · asked by Dude #2369™ 4

2007-07-07 12:12:27 · 19 answers · asked by Dude #2369™ 4

...than Hillary Clinton as President?

2007-07-07 11:45:54 · 6 answers · asked by naiveidealist 2

"Not so far beneath the surface, I think, we are becoming more, not less, alike.

I don't mean to exaggerate here, to suggest that pollsters are wrong and that our differences--racial, religious, regional, or economic--are somehow trivial, [but] facile expectations and simple explanations are being constantly upended. Spend time actually talking to Americans, and you discover that most evangelicals are more tolerant than the media would have us believe, most secularists more spiritual. Most rich people want the poor to succeed, and most of the poor are both more self-critical and hold higher aspiration than the popular culture allows. Most Republican strongholds are 40 percent Democrat, and vice versa. The political labels of liberal and conservative rarely track people's personal attributes."








Guesses, anybody? And what makes you guess the way you do?

2007-07-07 11:37:01 · 6 answers · asked by oimwoomwio 7

If Hilary Clinton becomes president, does that mean that Bill is the nations first lady?.

2007-07-07 11:09:58 · 3 answers · asked by Martin 2

We had 700,000 new citizens take the oath last year alone. If we are so bad, why do so many people come here and pledge allegiance to the US?

2007-07-07 11:07:48 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Talk radio in America is predominantly right-wing. Many Democrats are floating the idea of bringing back the Fairness Doctrine, which requires equal time on talk radio for opposite sides of the political aisle. Conservatives bash the idea on First Amendment grounds. Liberals say Americans are better informed when exposed to equal portions of both sides of an issue. Where do you stand?

2007-07-07 10:25:19 · 16 answers · asked by Tommy B 6

Does it make you stupid if you can't realize that the world would be a more dangerous place if the people who strapped bombs to their chests to kill others, controlled the government who controlled the oil riches of Iraq? Or would that just make you naive?

-----
Can anyone explain to me how the security of a stable government in Iraq is not in the interest of not only our national security, but that of the world?

2007-07-07 10:05:59 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I know a lot of people out there believe global warming is a myth despite the fact most scientists who think it's true have nothing to gain from it, and most scientist who call it a myth work for companies that are not environmentally friendly. My question is: Why are you willing to bet you're children's and grandchildren's future on this? If I'm wrong and global warming is a myth, what we will do is good for the environment anyway. Our descendants will have a better world to live on. If you're wrong and we do nothing the people of the future will have huge problems. I know you don't like or trust Al Gore, but can we really afford not to do anything about this when so many respected scientist say the world will be a very difficult place to live in less than a century?


So I guess my question for all the people who don't believe in global warming is are you willing to bet you're children's future on it?

2007-07-07 09:06:23 · 15 answers · asked by crushinator01 5

Does the all-time budget buster of all time expect us to believe that the Democrats are the reason he doubled the national debt?

2007-07-07 07:54:21 · 2 answers · asked by Scott K 7

With America fighting terror, saving the all the people in need, and making sure certain contries don't have certian powers, Who thinks they should just take over?

2007-07-07 07:10:54 · 14 answers · asked by jaems 2

http://tinyurl.com/2zqlzl

Clinton thought Fulbright was a great and wonderful human being

2007-07-07 06:51:51 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

The federal government is considering a series of new rules that would apply to workplaces where "explosives" are handled, giving rise to a concern that the restrictions could be used to limit – or eliminate – reasonable access to firearms ammunition.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56556

The government is using paperwork errors as small as the abbreviation of a city name to shut down some of the nation's longest-serving gun shops, and 2nd Amendment advocates fear the right to bear arms will mean little if there's no way to obtain a gun.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56389

The House of Representatives has fast-tracked new legislation to "improve" the National Instant Criminal Background Check System by allowing doctors to now decide who can own firearms.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56311

2007-07-07 06:34:29 · 7 answers · asked by Cookies Anyone? 5

(essay question. Plz be specific)

2007-07-07 06:31:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

And who is the strongest?

2007-07-07 04:44:22 · 14 answers · asked by Brettjb 1

Think about it. If Bush is really innocent as Republicans say, why not give 50% of the public benefit of the doubt and start impeachment hearings?
If he's really innocent, then surely there's nothing to worry about.

2007-07-07 04:43:24 · 11 answers · asked by Rosebee 4

Seriously, If you don't think Bush has broken any laws, don't bother to answer. I've outlined it for you so there's no confusion:
1) Blatant disregard for our international treaty obligations under the United Nations Charter and the Geneva Conventions - ie invading Iraq without the support of UN, and torture.

2) Growing evidence that the President deliberately misled the country into the war in Iraq.

3) Wiretapping of hundreds, possibly thousands, of Americans, in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) -- without a warrant.

The framers of our Constitution feared executive power run amok and provided the remedy of impeachment to protect against it. While impeachment is a last resort, and must never be lightly undertaken or used frivolously.

So was Clinton's impeachment frivolous? Did it make impeachment such a joke that congress is afraid to utilitze this tool when really nessesary?

2007-07-07 04:40:25 · 7 answers · asked by Rosebee 4

2007-07-07 04:25:30 · 2 answers · asked by Jose R 6

I know, silly question I'm sure it does but I figured I'd ask anyway.

2007-07-07 04:13:11 · 7 answers · asked by RP McMurphy 4

2007-07-07 03:54:22 · 6 answers · asked by Jose R 6

2007-07-07 03:50:52 · 5 answers · asked by Jose R 6

Do you think this might happen?

2007-07-07 03:46:37 · 12 answers · asked by BL 5

2007-07-07 03:46:31 · 27 answers · asked by smellslikeBS2me 1

Less People Less Damage on our World, this is the Dark side
of the Global Warming agenda.

2007-07-07 03:26:25 · 18 answers · asked by Dr Doom 4

Running all those amps, lights, etc. uses a ton of electricity. Lots of people showing up will be drving environmentally unfriendly gas combustion engines. The people will be drinking out of environmentally unfriendly cups. On and on it goes.

2007-07-07 03:01:01 · 10 answers · asked by RP McMurphy 4

Will you be riding your bicycles?

2007-07-07 02:56:14 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-07 02:51:48 · 9 answers · asked by RP McMurphy 4

http://tinyurl.com/2ddsxz

Madonna, who seems to be on top of all her many business endeavors, has actually invested about $2.7 million dollars in companies that are creating the destruction that Live Earth is trying to raise awareness about. She has invested in several companies named as the biggest corporate polluters in the world.

http://tinyurl.com/2ddsxz

2007-07-07 02:07:31 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous