2007-07-07 13:38:56 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
---
no, this should not be in the environmental section, because al gore will be running for president.
You have been reported for not answering, by the way.
2007-07-07 13:49:18 · update #1
I don't know which is less but I think the MOST energy is spent trying to keep the self-installed halo on Al Gore's head.
2007-07-07 13:57:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I would go with the dozen hydro-carbon powered Hummers. How much more natural than that can you get.
People please stop with the carbon credit garbage. Does this mean that rich people can buy their way to a anti-environmental lifestyle while they ask the rest of us to save the planet? Sounds like true hypocrisy to me. But then again that fits the Al Gore mold.
2007-07-07 14:38:51 · answer #2 · answered by bhopefull 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in the beginning, your figures are incorrect, yet in spite of in the event that they have been stunning, and in spite of if Gore became the main important hypocrite interior the international, an advert hominem argument is a logical fallacy and a debate loser. Secondly, there became by no ability a time whilst a hundred% of scientists theory the international became flat. worldwide warming is a scientific absolute. it incredibly is a actuality. It does exist. No good scientist denies it nor doubts it. The reason is what's arguable, however the overpowering information is that human interest is in many circumstances in charge. the different question isn't any count if or no longer it incredibly is in basic terms too previous via do something approximately it. it ought to correctly be, yet not one of the innovations for a thank you to cut back the priority are risky, collectively as ignoring the innovations ought to correctly be to our detriment and the detriment of destiny generations. Now, for the easy premise of this question. Al Gore has an previous property in Tennessee which he's consistently upgrading to deliver it into compliance along with his own standards .the homestead serves as his place of work and homes various workers. this implies that it incredibly is probably no longer whilst in comparison with the conventional homestead in that distinctive area of the rustic. an more advantageous assessment would be with an place of work complicated, and in that regard, Gore is fairly eco-friendly even thinking the age of the valuables. replace for Justgetitright; Re-study what I incredibly have written. I recognized that there is debate over the reason of worldwide warming. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, worldwide warming itself is a actuality. The median temperature of the planet is increasing at a incredibly stable and measurable fee. there's no wager artwork in contact right here. In some factors of the international, the effects are extra glaring than in others, and in some factors, the areas are incredibly cooling via shifts interior the jet flow and so on. however the arctic ice IS melting off. Huricanes ARE on the upward push. None of it incredibly is opinion.
2016-09-29 06:59:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore is a douche. HE didn't put on the concert, the performers did, and thank your lucky stars he isn't running for president. And let us remember that those who attended and some that watched paid money to help "the cause", what ever that means. I think that if you melted Al Gore you could fuel a dozen Hummers. So, Al takes up too much space and wastes energy. Thank you.
2007-07-07 13:58:10 · answer #4 · answered by Hot Coco Puff 7 · 9⤊ 2⤋
kinda toughbecause al gore does buy carbon credits for his house, but he buys them off himself in a big scam so his mansion uses a lot of energy. and all the private jets flying into the concert uses a lot of energy not to mention all the computers and tv that have to turned on all day for the concert. i would say a dozen hummers use less energy.
2007-07-07 13:51:05 · answer #5 · answered by Abbey loves Jesus 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's easy. A dozen hummers use less fuel in a year than the jets flying these stars to even ONE of these concerts.
2007-07-07 14:24:16 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
al gores house. he uses 100% natural energy, drives a hybrid/flexfuel car-The concert is entirely recycable, however all the flying even though they all bought carbon credits to offset the Co2 produces alot of CO2. The hummers, well, u can guess that they use the most. Except for Arnold S. tricked out hummers that run on hydrogen and E85.
2007-07-07 13:46:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Shouldn't this be in the Environment section?
2007-07-07 13:41:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
What is quite clear is that your brain uses NO energy.
It is dead.
2007-07-07 13:42:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
xD
2007-07-07 13:46:15 · answer #10 · answered by the cookie princess 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋