English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - January 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Saw the Telegraph today and logged on. Can't believe the amount of e-mail protesters(not that that's a bad thing). Anyone else out there logged on and said "NO!!!"?

2007-01-10 02:09:58 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-10 01:35:47 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

lies, Corporate America, war for richest of the rich

2007-01-10 01:30:53 · 11 answers · asked by Eric the Great *USA* 4

the denial of reality, who's gonna make the popcorn?

2007-01-10 01:27:17 · 20 answers · asked by The Twist 3

2007-01-10 01:16:39 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/10/science/10climate.html?th&emc=th

Agency Affirms Human Influence on Climate
By ANDREW C. REVKIN
Published: January 10, 2007
President Bush has said it.
A lot of government scientists have said it.
But until yesterday, it appeared that no news release on annual climate trends out of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the Bush White House had said unequivocally that a buildup of greenhouse gases was helping warm the climate.
The statement came in a release that said 2006 was the warmest year for the 48 contiguous states since regular temperature records began in 1895. It surpassed the previous champion, 1998, a year heated up by a powerful episode of the periodic warming of the tropical Pacific Ocean by El Niño. Last year, another El Niño developed, but this time a long-term warming trend from human activities was said to be involved as well.

2007-01-10 01:15:14 · 11 answers · asked by Bad M 4

2007-01-10 01:08:00 · 8 answers · asked by maysha 1

I don't support terrorists.

I don't support terrorism.

I don't believe in killing anyone who's not a Muslim.

I highly dislike the fact that people judge all Muslims by what idiotic radical lunatics have done in the name of Islam - Whom I also hate.

I try to do my best to stand up against terrorism.

I don't believe in drawing my information from the Media considering that that's where most people get their false information about Muslims from.

I don't enjoy harming people and/or animals -- Nor do I actually harm any.

What do you think of me?

2007-01-10 01:01:05 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think the British national party has a few good ideas such as leaving the EU, National service, Protecting our culture etc.

However I find them a bit racist and far to right.

My question is is there a party something in between the two?

2007-01-10 00:58:34 · 9 answers · asked by Blink-Monkey-Blink 2

2007-01-10 00:46:45 · 12 answers · asked by conservativeguyfromnc 2

Have you ever met a Muslim on a personal basis that supported terrorism and/or terrorist(s)?

Have you ever met a Muslim who didn't support terrorism and/or terrorist(s)?

2007-01-10 00:33:08 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/08/bush-more-troops/

2007-01-10 00:12:50 · 2 answers · asked by Bistro 7

Will the USA ever risk their allegiance with Pakistan and back their bid? 3 permanent members - UK, Russia & France - would advocate, while china would probably abstain. VIEWS????

2007-01-10 00:00:56 · 2 answers · asked by DeZZy 2

After 2000, nothing would have persuaded me to ever support him or his party.

2007-01-09 23:57:28 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

send off for my birth certifacte first before going to get a replacement?

2007-01-09 23:49:52 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

send off for my birth certifacte first before going to get a replacement?

2007-01-09 23:49:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will this strategy work? Is it worth it? Is it too little, too late?

2007-01-09 23:46:32 · 14 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5

Is that all the government knows about a handful of stolen rocket launchers in the hands of the australian community ?.You want want to shake in you boots as there's a lot more out there than rocket launchers .C3,C4 plastic explosive, ground to air missiles ,bullets that can penetrate any type of bullet proofing (stainsteel bullets with a copper coating so there is no barrel jam or scoring )and do you think that people in australian society would use these on the lucas heights reactor or parliment house?No ! ,as there got better places to go and see because the mentality of the australian's is to go some where quite and blow some thing up and lay back and have a beer .If some body wanted some thing to happen it would happen but it does not happen because no body wants it to happen?The australian government put too much regulation on society instead of having trust in society as society would stop a terrorist quicker because they know whats going on than the police or army? views ?

2007-01-09 23:05:35 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

congress & left are in power by people not terrorists .

2007-01-09 23:02:56 · 12 answers · asked by prithvi 3

Why they U.S.A fund the war with that money???

2007-01-09 22:58:37 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-09 22:13:25 · 16 answers · asked by zolsmor 1

Lets face it the American people demanded change (especially in the Iraq situation) this past November. We expressed our desire to see our troops headed for home. So to me it is apparent that the Leadership before the election lost due to this War failures. Now Bush is sending more Troops....is this being done to try to show that the Democrates can't do any better? That even with a Democratic Congress Iraq still is a failure!

It appears that Bush just doesn't care what we the Americans think....he is pushing forward with his own agenda.

What do you think?

2007-01-09 22:12:01 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Thanking you kindly my fellow conspiracy-seekers!

2007-01-09 22:00:47 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

From Africa and south America

2007-01-09 21:58:44 · 8 answers · asked by DAVAY 3

Why is it the democrats are in an uproar about the war in Iraq when it takes an act of all three branches of the government to go to war. The president doesn't act upon what he sees with his own eyes either. He acts on what other people tell him, from the lowly private to the secretary of defense and the vice president.

2007-01-09 21:38:46 · 12 answers · asked by Richard Cranium 3

Why is it the democrats are in an uproar about the war in Iraq when it takes an act of all three branches of the government to go to war. The president doesn't act upon what he sees with his own eyes either. He acts on what other people tell him, from the lowly private to the secretary of defense and the vice president.

2007-01-09 21:38:06 · 7 answers · asked by Richard Cranium 3

fedest.com, questions and answers