From the very beginning, when he stole the election, the war in Iraq and now the so called surge in the troops. Bushwacko more like it.
2007-01-10 01:36:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. This will ONLY fattens the pockets of Corporate America,Canada and Mexico.
Oh and in 1991 Daddy Bush proposed this plan for North America.
2007-01-10 09:40:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes because he thinks that he rules such a great Nation. But he isn't very good a being a President. Stephen Harper has been the "BEST" Prime Minister of Canada ever!! Bush is setting a bad example...which can cause Disaster such as Nuclear bombs with the Koreans and things. He lies pretty good and he think that he has to be rich. I can't stand him. I would have voted Kerry during the last election but I am a Canadian.
2007-01-10 09:41:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by xoxMeaghanoxo 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
It seems you've been bush whacked, and it has had a deleterious effect on your ability to think. This is readily shown by your listing of unsupported and false accusasions.
2007-01-10 09:38:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
It would appear so. Didn't take long for someone to point the finger @ Clinton did it?
2007-01-10 09:38:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by T S 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Does this really require a answer? I mean really his track record tells the answer!
2007-01-10 09:36:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, Al-Aqida in Somalia and Iraq has been Bush-Whacked!!!
2007-01-10 09:34:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
your so-called question here makes didly sense. but then what else would I expect from a whiner who foams at the mouth with senseless rhetoric.
2007-01-10 09:34:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by tcbtoday123 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
We've been Bush-whacked and Dick-whacked.
Have a nice day!
2007-01-10 09:34:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sherri 2 Kewl 5
·
4⤊
4⤋
You may have been... I have not. I knew the US government were jackasses all along.
2007-01-10 09:34:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by private 4
·
3⤊
4⤋