Other - Politics & Government - September 2006

It was SO cute to see George pretend he was a Navy pilot in his bulky little flight suit, and stand out on the aircraft barrier with his "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" banner a few years ago! His imagination knows no bounds!

What do you think he'll dress up as next? Will he still say the mission's accomplished, or something else exciting?

2006-09-13 04:54:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Those who are doing every crooked things to ruin the country,
rape the society, devide the people, increase unemployment,
price rise, and doing whatever they want for themselves,
and protect the corrupt MP's who were shown on TV asking and
taking bribes from MPLAD funds and raising questions in
Parliament.

2006-09-13 04:49:32 · 7 answers · asked by pianist 5

Liberals need: public transportation, organic farms, universal health care, art museums, gay rights, environmental laws, renewable energy, universities accessable to all, fair tax bases, retirement security, and really good gourmet restaurants

NeoCons need: No taxes, a super large military, Wal-Mart, coorporate farms, high wages for CEO's, lots of oil, a great highway system, many churches, TV evangelistis, chain restaurants, and Hummers.

Let's face it: we are very different. Let's divorce and each take our half of the land mass and move on. Who gets what?

2006-09-13 04:48:34 · 11 answers · asked by tarro 3

2006-09-13 04:48:17 · 4 answers · asked by Tracy L 1

The Governor is forming a task force to address the problem of low scores on pre-kindergarten tests given to children from low income areas. Task force is faced with three stipulations. 1) Solution has to work. 2) Solution cannot cost the state any money, and 3) there have to be measurable results within four years so he can present them during his reelection campaign.

How would you address this problem while adhering to all three stipulations?

Please keep in mind that this is a psychology class.

2006-09-13 04:30:15 · 6 answers · asked by flyerball 2

To commemorate one of the greatest presidencys in American history, we are going to have to make the decision as to where we can build a George W Bush monument.

Seems like there's lots of space on the Mall right now. I don't think it should be next to FDR's monument because he was a liberal. While Bush was in the same league as Abraham Lincoln, there is not enough space around the Lincoln Memorial for another monument.

Do you guys have any suggestions? Where in Washington should we build a monument for George W Bush?

2006-09-13 04:10:24 · 28 answers · asked by conservativeguyfromnc 2

2006-09-13 04:06:20 · 12 answers · asked by Vishal E 1

2006-09-13 04:00:48 · 20 answers · asked by J. Charles 6

Why is it that townships in the state of Michigan don't not pay sales taxes or even a percent of sales taxes but charge sales tax? Michigan as a state funds them why souldn't they have to pay some back? What makes them any better than us small business?

2006-09-13 03:57:44 · 2 answers · asked by jewels 1

2006-09-13 03:53:45 · 20 answers · asked by dmizzleo 2

why influences did John Maynard Keynes have on JFK?
please list website with sources if avaliable thanks :)

2006-09-13 03:39:31 · 1 answers · asked by shy pie 2

a. death to America
b. restore the caliphate
c. the people
d. the base

2006-09-13 03:33:17 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 03:32:07 · 13 answers · asked by indianincredible 1

Even Osama.

I think one of the hijackers was Egyptian,
so what nationality do people think
the hijackers were?

oh, and why are the BUshies in bed with the Saudis?

2006-09-13 03:31:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

NOW, when the Ottoman Turks attempted to invade Europe, that was another matter. My great, great, great, etc. grandfather (Joseph Sobeski - the last king of Poland) and his brother-in-law (Vlad - The Impailer) kicked some serious butt and sent them back home with their weennies wagging. If the Radical Islamists want to keep messing with the US, I am ready, willing and able to take up the family tradition. When is the rest of the Muslim world going to see how much damage these kooks are doing to THEM, not just the West?

2006-09-13 03:20:26 · 8 answers · asked by Spirit Walker 5

A seemingly intractable conflict which perpetuates hatred and death from both sides on a daily basis. A conflict which has ramifications outside the immediate communities and effects global politics to a disproportionate degree. Is there any chance for peace and reconciliation?

2006-09-13 03:18:38 · 14 answers · asked by idler22 4

With the poverty amongst the people and the presidents living expensive and lavish, should they win say peace, health, best governance and many other awards for what they are doing.

Also, do you think these guys are really genuine counrtymen or just selfish dictators?

2006-09-13 03:07:37 · 10 answers · asked by Tumze 2

Tuesday on the View, she said Christians were just as guilty of terrorism as the Islamic terrorists.
She forgot to mention the part where Christian leaders force young people to strap bombs on themselves and blow up innocent bystanders. She also forgot to mention the Christians who cut off peoples heads. Or the Christians who stone women to death. What do you think?

2006-09-13 03:02:28 · 41 answers · asked by sister_godzilla 6

]
I guess if you think beheading and shooting women and men for disputable crimes without any justice system organization or citizen representation, as the people, including small children are forced to look on is good family values...

Is this the kind of government you feel comfortable knowing your president's family is so kissy face and cozy with?
ANd why does Bush PHYSICALLY and metaphorically hold hands with the Saudi's?

Does Bush and the US sound like a government who gives two craps about the lives of innocent civilians or who would even care what an evil dicatator does to it's people, never mind try to use it as a cause to go to war?

They do horrific things to people in Saudi arabia, it's an evil country if there ever was one,
so why is the Bush family in bed with it's leaders?

2006-09-13 02:58:47 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think there's "too much sex" in the media?

Do you resent people who have a sexually loose lifestyle?

Do you support "abstinence only" education?

Do you think that women should dress more modestly, instead of in slutty fashions?

Do you think that strip clubs are a public nuisance?

Well, if you answer "yes" to the above questions, you need to know who else feels the same way:

ISLAMIC RADICALS!

When you agree with them on their sexual phobias, you're just strengthening the hand of the Terrorists.

Remember-- Sexual Freedom: It's the American Way!

2006-09-13 02:52:06 · 11 answers · asked by kreevich 5

has anyone read the book? do you think today's government is similar?

2006-09-13 02:35:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

i think these people like to see under the headlines terrorist attack or just being called terrorist theyre probably proud to be called that so why dont we as americans change that and play some mind games and just call them what they are, cowardist. The media can never use the term terrorist, they can say "cowardist attack" or "an act of cowardism" terror just brings up bad thoughts so lets use a word that will really describe them and use coward from now on, so make it happen and write your senator or counsilman about this

2006-09-13 02:31:08 · 10 answers · asked by keopci 1

Short supply + high demand = high prices.
Large supply + low demand = low prices.

I know that most of you who were complaining about the high price of gas are liberal democrats who "grad-ee-eated" from a government sanctioned child abuse indoctrination center (public school). I also know that my 7 yr. old grandson probably understands more about economics than you do. Anyway, ARE YOU BEGINNING TO UNDERSTAND BASIC ECONOMICS 101?

2006-09-13 02:16:16 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

it have to clearly understand the meaning in this sentence.

2006-09-13 01:58:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

For instance, many conservatives think the world is less than 10,000 years old.
I can see how someone would think there's "plenty of oil" --even as consumerist China's demand looms--
When one thinks that the earth produced oil in only thousands of years....if this were the case, the earth would STILL be producing oil and it wouldn't be called a LIMITED resource.....

I wonder what other fallacious views cloud their perception.........

2006-09-13 01:56:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-13 01:44:58 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

When the West want to go to war, petrol is expensive, then when petrol prices go down terrorist attackes begin! I'm a bit worried cos petrols so cheap at the moment...

2006-09-13 01:36:42 · 20 answers · asked by babyeddieuk 3

Would you prefer a situation where you knew that, if you spoke out openly against Saddam, there was a chance that you might get killed - or would you prefer today's situation where there is an increased and totally random chance that you will get killed?

I'd prefer knowing who my enemy was - I'd feel a lot more unsafe today. But tell me what you think?

2006-09-13 01:29:48 · 17 answers · asked by Big E 3

2006-09-13 01:29:15 · 6 answers · asked by booboo 7

see this blog and then say - http://f-b-i-keep-fooling-people.blogspot.com/2006/09/fbi-american-intelligence-keep-fooling.html

2006-09-13 01:27:30 · 1 answers · asked by Karma 2