i think these people like to see under the headlines terrorist attack or just being called terrorist theyre probably proud to be called that so why dont we as americans change that and play some mind games and just call them what they are, cowardist. The media can never use the term terrorist, they can say "cowardist attack" or "an act of cowardism" terror just brings up bad thoughts so lets use a word that will really describe them and use coward from now on, so make it happen and write your senator or counsilman about this
2006-09-13 02:31:08 · 10 answers · asked by keopci 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
tim thomas aint no fugazy, if you didn't like my answer to your post, be mature about it. This is the comment you made to me, when you gave me the best answer and i'm quoting your words, "I don't really think this is the best answer, I just wanted to show an example of why women shouldn't be wrestling fans....because they don't know shi*!!!! lol". Just because you didn't like my answer to your post, you felt the need to insult all women, attack me, not all women, my answer is the one you didn't like and quite honestly, it was an unnecessary comment, you made to me, i didn't give you an insulting answer, grow up. Anyone can see that i'm not lying about what you said to me, all they have to do, is go to your questions and look under the question about the WWE pay-per-views being 4 times a year. Thanks for the 10 points anyway, I did have 1,855 points and your ten, gave me 1,865 points, have a nice day. Oh, by the way, even though you insulted me, I agree with you 100% about changing the word terrorist to cowardist!
2006-09-13 09:28:59 · answer #1 · answered by A_WWE_FAN_4LYFE 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Coward has a negative connotation. And in our politically correct world of today, we don't want to hurt anyones feelings now. Do we? Even if it is a bunch of well educated, gutless murderers that wish to wipe us off the face of the earth. But we must be sensitive to their opinions and feelings.
Political correctness is taking this country down. We need to reverse the trend and go back to calling a spade and spade and let the chips fall where they may.
2006-09-13 09:49:15 · answer #2 · answered by scubadiver50704 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because you can terrorize someone, but it is hard to cowardize them.
They are coward terrorists, if you ask me...
2006-09-13 09:39:59 · answer #3 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
... because then if I went for a walk in a farmer's field, was chased by a bull and ran away... that would make me a terrorist! (if the two words meant the same thing)
2006-09-13 11:31:25 · answer #4 · answered by smelly pete 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Main Entry: cow·ard
Pronunciation: 'kau(-&)rd
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French cuard, from cue, coe tail, from Latin cauda
: one who shows disgraceful fear or timidity
- coward adjective
What was Saddam Hussein doing when they found him?
Anybody want to bet Osama will be doing the same when they find him?
Point made.
2006-09-13 10:11:41 · answer #5 · answered by Dave 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bill Maher said it best: these people are not cowards. They are very brave. What they are is despicable, disgusting, and horrible people.
2006-09-13 09:34:55 · answer #6 · answered by std 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That'll never fly.
What terrorists do is dastardly, not cowardly. It does take courage to blow yourself up for what you believe in. It's what they believe in that's the problem, not their courage or lack of it.
2006-09-13 11:47:38 · answer #7 · answered by kreevich 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree they are cowards! They are also Murderers!
2006-09-13 09:37:01 · answer #8 · answered by vanhammer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How about sick and twisted and being brainwashed by their religion since childhood.
2006-09-13 09:56:17 · answer #9 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If someone is willing to die, i.e. suicide bombers, I would call them crazy, not cowards.
2006-09-13 09:36:02 · answer #10 · answered by Dr Dee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋