English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - July 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2006-07-05 10:41:38 · 10 answers · asked by The Bearded One 4

I hope Bush does not treat it like Iraq, and give them more time, they had all the time in the world to hide stuff.

2006-07-05 10:25:15 · 17 answers · asked by bryton1001 4

After environmental destruction, widespread disease, and all out war I give it 500 years. Quite possibly less. Maybe Marx's idea will win by default. And get your idea of Soviet style communism out of your mind before you respond. I am referring to pure Marxist ideology where the state fades away. Small functional communes. Not the totalitarian mess that existed in the Soviet Union. That was not communism. That was a totalitarianism state. And the models that followed suit were also totalitarian states. I am talking Das Kapital here pure and simple. Talk ideology with me. Not rhetoric. I am an old political science graduate (international relations/ political philosophy) from the University of Wisconsin. If you are not politically educated please do not answer. I don't want sound bites from Rush Limbaugh. And I don't want to hear about how successful you became from a real estate scam ("you can do it too!!!" haha). I want a true discussion on political philosophy.

2006-07-05 10:19:34 · 7 answers · asked by cannonball 1

2006-07-05 10:18:52 · 18 answers · asked by Quickie 3

An embryo has a mother and a father, so why are the mothers always responsible for choices and decisions, where are the proud fathers?

Men are always complaining about abortion, calling women murderers who choose abortion, are the fathers of embroys murderers too?

Why won't men step up for their unborn, don't men keep up with their own sperm, their own embroys, why won't fathers be responsible for their own children?

2006-07-05 09:54:04 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm not advocating violence or anything. However I don't think there will be any other way to take America back, from the corrupt big government and huge corporations, than a bloody revolution. Am I just totaly wrong?

2006-07-05 09:37:15 · 16 answers · asked by scrubb201kt 1

Just think...Just think...im not antisemitic..many of u will say so...but for a moment if u think as neutral person...we v got jews in every strategic position in u.s. in media it is their hold..in defence..they are the key...politics..business..finance e.g. world bank as we all know...commerce and trade...you name it i claim it...jewish jaw is on our neck...isnt it???

2006-07-05 09:35:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is anyone curious, as to the different religions beliefs of those who participate in answers?

With so many evangelical ministers, tent revivals, the crusaders like Graham, Falwell, Robinson and others in the past 50 years; were you influenced by these preachers?

Have you read the Bible?

2006-07-05 09:34:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

all the more reason to impeach him and hilary clinton isnt living in the white hose with rumors of devorce. i still wish he will be impeached!!!!!!!!!!!

2006-07-05 09:19:49 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

to safeguurd interests and remove grieviences of majority community,hindus

2006-07-05 08:53:12 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

''The deaths of two Israeli soldiers receive more appalled attention than nearly 100 Palestinian deaths, including those of children. The Israeli fighters are called soldiers, the Palestinian fighters terrorists. Ehud Barak is portrayed as a rational and practical dove even though, like the Ulster Unionists, he says "no" to most things, while Yasser Arafat is shown as erratic and unpredictable. Most tellingly, the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem have become, in western media parlance, "disputed lands", not "occupied territories".

What do you think folks? Have we lost our sense of Humanity and fallen into supporting a Tyrannic Government who is, under the Geneva conventions, commitign an Illegal and Criminal war against the Palestinians?

2006-07-05 08:47:22 · 6 answers · asked by thomas p 5

i just need to know the pecking order

2006-07-05 08:35:05 · 4 answers · asked by sam_and_danny4ever@sbcglobal.net 1

Whats interesting is how many different answers I will get!

2006-07-05 08:29:55 · 17 answers · asked by Eve 2

2006-07-05 08:28:15 · 6 answers · asked by Alie 3

2006-07-05 08:25:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-05 07:40:56 · 14 answers · asked by anya_mystica 4

Is it what you do...or who you know?

2006-07-05 07:40:11 · 7 answers · asked by yogazen 4

One of them was a long range ICBM, but exploded after 40 seconds into flight. How should the United State's respond? More sanctions? At what point should we respond with a military pre-emptive strike?

2006-07-05 07:35:09 · 8 answers · asked by kicker 1

I get so tired of people (dumb U.S. citizens especially) that try and heap everything as “George Bush’s fault.” O.K., if you’re talking about Iraq I’m willing to somewhat agree with you on that, but other issues ranging from North Korea to Venezuela are more about anti-Americanism moreso than Anti-Bushism. Americans need to realize there’s a global wave of Anti-Americanism and that some of these clowns are riding the coattails of Anti-Americanism to further their agenda, like Hugo Chavez in Venezuela.

1.) North Korea – They’ve been a troublemaker since the end of the Korean War.
2.) Iran – State sponsor of terror and has provided safe haven and support to Hamas and Islamic Jihad for decades. Their current president has been identified as one of the ringleaders of the 1979 embassy siege. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad
* The Iranian president has often said the Holocaust is a myth and that Israel should be “wiped off the map.”

2006-07-05 07:24:51 · 8 answers · asked by baq2calli 2

2006-07-05 07:13:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

ROME Jul 5, 2006 (AP)— Prosecutors said Wednesday they had arrested two Italian intelligence officers and were seeking four more Americans as part of an investigation into the alleged CIA kidnapping of an Egyptian cleric in Milan in 2003.

The arrest of the two SISMI intelligence officials was the first official acknowledgment that Italian agents were involved in a case that the government has complained was a violation of its sovereignty.

In a statement released in Milan, prosecutors said three Americans being sought were CIA agents, while the fourth worked at the joint U.S.-Italian air base of Aviano, where the Egyptian was allegedly taken after his abduction.

2006-07-05 07:07:35 · 3 answers · asked by cantcu 7

Could it be becuase we put them on reservations away from everyone else? They are not really a part of our society where they can claim discrimation and poor treatment.
No one was more poorly treated than native americans. We stole their land, tried to destroy their way of living, tried to destroy their beliefs and culture. Many of them are suffering.
Why aren't they whining for extra-special treatment?

2006-07-05 06:57:54 · 22 answers · asked by Lou 6

And for the record I feel that neither one are bad. They are simply foreign to a capitalist republic. I am an old political science (international relations/ political philosophy) graduate from the University of Wisconsin. A good number of Americans are not properly schooled in political philosophy. It would help them to better understand government in general.

2006-07-05 06:36:45 · 15 answers · asked by cannonball 1

is it just conservative vs liberal issue.
Our we really that significant in this universe??

2006-07-05 06:35:51 · 16 answers · asked by SUEC' 1

The U.S., Europe, China, Japan and others by doing this endeavor are spending not millions of dollars but BILLIONS! [ala Kevin Spacey accent :) ]

I honestly think it's a huge waste. What are they really doing it for? To study the universe? Contacting E.T.? Experimenting space weapons? A space race? What?! If it's one or all of the above, it's beyond my understanding.

Sure, many will say it's important for whatever reason, but c'mon do they have to spend BILLIONS?! I don't think I have to say where that amount of money should go to. Governtments shouldn't be doing that today. Is there anyone raising a voice against this in the U.S. I wonder what NASA's budget is and do Americans even know the real figures? That goes for the other countries.

I think space exploration should be left to future generations or at least today the filthy rich individuals-Let them spend for it not the government. What do you think? I wanna hear your honest opinion.

2006-07-05 06:31:39 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers