English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - July 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2006-07-05 03:07:52 · 17 answers · asked by josh 06 1

2006-07-05 02:54:11 · 9 answers · asked by sugar-n-spice 2

2006-07-05 02:44:12 · 2 answers · asked by thewuss 1

Take it the answer's yes as society's done it to men for long enuf.

2006-07-05 02:33:23 · 8 answers · asked by welcome_to_how_things_will_be 3

2006-07-05 02:28:29 · 6 answers · asked by shp731 1

in a way of legal strike on government side? Why they do that?
Why casino has to shut down too.. isnt that private industry?

2006-07-05 02:27:03 · 2 answers · asked by LetMEtell&AskYOU 5

2006-07-05 01:41:28 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-05 01:31:54 · 20 answers · asked by honey 3

Since the term, War on Drugs, was coined in the Nixon administration, drugs are cheaper and easier to get than ever. Regulation would take the power away from dealers and place it in the hands of medical professionals.

2006-07-05 01:23:36 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

well, have you?

2006-07-05 01:09:53 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-05 00:30:11 · 8 answers · asked by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4

?

2006-07-05 00:26:02 · 2 answers · asked by animalcrossing1825 1

Please dont tell me i was the only one who saw Koizumi dancing and singing Elvis Presley songs during his visit to Graceland accompanied by President Bush? I think its nice that we can see the relaxed side of these people sometimes instead of just blah blah blah politics, money, blah blah blah! Well it gave me a bit of chuckle. Anyone else?

2006-07-05 00:23:59 · 5 answers · asked by Boon5 3

2006-07-04 23:32:06 · 8 answers · asked by Armygirl 2

e.g.
Nuclear weapons, and balistic missile testing, environmental ethics and responsiblity.

2006-07-04 23:10:55 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

i think it should not exist at all

2006-07-04 22:26:28 · 10 answers · asked by Mars 1

during ww2 the french and polish fighters were called resistance fighters because they fought an occuping force.isn't this exactly what the malitias are doing in iraq?fighting a resistance force?then why do we call them terrorist?

2006-07-04 22:19:41 · 14 answers · asked by stanyazfan 3

2006-07-04 21:46:40 · 4 answers · asked by ra 1

If Invading & Ruling another country is BAD, Then England holds No.1 position is the list of Bad Countries, Because they ruled so many countries in asia & africa, Isn't it?

2006-07-04 21:27:23 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

dont get me wrong i love america and i am very very proud to be american but there is always room for improvement what do you think would make america even greater pls no dumb bush hate slang Thanks

2006-07-04 21:25:41 · 14 answers · asked by freded_124 3

I know about the corruption going on but why is the gap widening? I thought the free trade agreement was to help the mexican people in having more industry there. If we are so good at getting mixed up in human affairs all over the world, why aren't we just taking over Mexico and force the government to do something about the plight of their people. We do it everywhere else in the world. Is it because the have no oil? That can't be it because I heard they do. Or, is it because they have no nuclear program? If that's the case, it just goes to show that the government has other motives when saying it is doing it for the good of human interest.

2006-07-04 21:25:39 · 5 answers · asked by SonoranAngel 6

I know about the corruption going on but why is the gap widening? I thought the free trade agreement was to help the mexican people in having more industry there. If we are so good at getting mixed up in human affairs all over the world, why aren't we just taking over Mexico and force the government to do something about the plight of their people. We do it everywhere else in the world.

2006-07-04 21:22:04 · 3 answers · asked by SonoranAngel 6

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/070306.html

CIA: Osama Helped Bush in '04

By Robert Parry
July 4, 2006

On Oct. 29, 2004, just four days before the U.S. presidential election, al-Qaeda leader Osama bin-Laden released a videotape denouncing George W. Bush. Some Bush supporters quickly spun the diatribe as “Osama’s endorsement of John Kerry.” But behind the walls of the CIA, analysts had concluded the opposite: that bin-Laden was trying to help Bush gain a second term.

This stunning CIA disclosure is tucked away in a brief passage near the end of Ron Suskind’s The One Percent Doctrine, which draws heavily from CIA insiders. Suskind wrote that the CIA analysts based their troubling assessment on classified information, but the analysts still puzzled over exactly why bin-Laden wanted Bush to stay in office.

According to Suskind’s book, CIA analysts had spent years “parsing each expressed word of the al-Qaeda leader and his deputy, [Ayman] Zawahiri. What they’d learned over nearly a decade is that bin-Laden speaks onl

2006-07-04 21:11:11 · 17 answers · asked by MaSTeR 3

fedest.com, questions and answers