English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

They should launch a couple of Missiles, and nuke the crap outta 'em

2006-07-05 09:03:20 · answer #1 · answered by Blasphemer 3 · 0 0

A preemptive strike in this case would cause a domino effect of alliances, much like the first world war. This isn't like Iraq, which for the most part stands on its own in the Middle East. North Korea is in an alliance with China and Russia. It sounds arcane, but we must wait until they strike; the devastation would be terrible, but would be nothing in comparison to the retribution by N. Korea's allies.

2006-07-05 14:39:00 · answer #2 · answered by nukecat25 3 · 0 0

We learn from experience...Their missel tests will continue to be failures for the time being no real threat. Therefore there's an implied threat that they'll get the missels working properly eventually. It's only in that eventuality that we should take immediate and direct action. We should pressure our "friends" (we really haven't any...even the British actually don't much care for our policies though their government seems to buy into them) into acton NOW! Just remember Neville Chamberlain PM of England during the beginnings of the 3rd Reich.

2006-07-05 14:19:22 · answer #3 · answered by thebigm57 7 · 0 0

We sit back and let diplomacy run its course. But we must be ready to attack. Korea is an extremely volatile situation and a this would be the place for a preemptive strike but following Iraq there are to many weak minded people in the US who would not support such an action.

2006-07-05 14:24:09 · answer #4 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0 0

Let Japan lead, if they desperately need our help we'll follow. Japan is WAY more in danger then we are.

Definitely don't wait until they attack us, one nuke could kill hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people.

Let Japan do their thing, diplomacy is always the best way though.

Also, we need to put some heat on China to buckle up against Nuclear weapons in North Korea. China basically controlls all of N. Korea economical wise.

2006-07-05 14:17:39 · answer #5 · answered by nsh_tt 3 · 0 0

We shouldn't attack unless they hit us first. North Korea is desperately poor, and the great majority of her citizens have nothing to do with these missile launches.

2006-07-05 14:17:29 · answer #6 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 0 0

Why would we attack? Are you nuts????? They tested and did not launch any nuclear missiles. They tested blanks that failed. Come on people, are you war crazy?? Even shoot from the hip GWB is not talking that way. You need a brain transplant.

2006-07-05 15:40:47 · answer #7 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0 0

We haven't FINISHED the job in Iraq yet, even though I would LOVE to see that little tyrant slapped around.

Time to let some of the MULTIDUDE of countries we protect step up and DO SOMETHING........Japan, S. Korea are you there?

2006-07-05 14:20:20 · answer #8 · answered by R J 7 · 0 0

we CAN NOT ATTACK. they will blow our whole country up if we attack them. we need to use DIIPLOMACY.... I have faith that bush can do this thru diplomacy and we won't need to get into a race to build up our arms against theirs

that could be another cold war all over again

2006-07-05 14:17:27 · answer #9 · answered by nieder 3 · 0 0

Do you think other countries should attack us when we test our missels.

2006-07-05 16:41:08 · answer #10 · answered by Lou 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers