Military - January 2007

then Who behind this fighting?and if your answer is NO then why US is not willing realy to stop it?
Please put into consideration that this fighting is one of the result of US invasion which took place under the pretext of the alleged Saddam,s Weapon of Mass Destruction and without the approaval of the UN.

2007-01-19 04:21:39 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-19 04:15:40 · 11 answers · asked by wanttolpve 4

Hey all. Is there a way my husband can go to college locally and be non-deployable? He's in the national guard reserves. we were told there was a way, but cant remember how or what the program was called. please help! any info would be useful!

2007-01-19 04:13:33 · 6 answers · asked by latingal23 1

2007-01-19 04:05:57 · 1 answers · asked by NORMAN E 1

2007-01-19 03:55:54 · 3 answers · asked by NORMAN E 1

I need to know this for the women in combat debate. The thing is that they (the goverment and upper powers) dont alow women to go into direct ground combat (engage with the enemy) all they can do is fly transport vehicals. They consider that serviece and we want to get them into acualy combat.

2007-01-19 03:55:48 · 9 answers · asked by Joshua 1

2007-01-19 03:52:30 · 4 answers · asked by *~*~BABY GURL~*~* 1

The USA can't even do that.

2007-01-19 03:43:00 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-19 03:37:39 · 5 answers · asked by halfway 4

2007-01-19 03:35:31 · 21 answers · asked by halfway 4

Should she have to be kicked out of the military? Besides some guy wants GAY people to be able to join the military openly. Does anyone know how much she made from the deal?

2007-01-19 03:25:58 · 8 answers · asked by Lt Dan 2

2007-01-19 03:10:56 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Im a honors student in high school. i will have no problem getting into college, and i can pay for it. but im not sure if thats what i want to do. a part of me want to go active duty for the marine core and get my education through them. its dangerous, but honorable... need advice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-01-19 03:09:06 · 17 answers · asked by wonder 2

The United Nations approaved this right to any people subjected to direct occupation . US now is occuping Iraq without the approaval of the UN .

2007-01-19 03:07:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-19 03:05:58 · 12 answers · asked by wonder 2

In 50 years my guess is that there will barely be no females because china, south korea, India and alot of other countries kill their females leaving behind a big proportion of males. In the years to come females will pretty much be endangered. Why isn't anyone doing anything about this?

2007-01-19 03:04:53 · 10 answers · asked by Trey 2

too many lives lost already and no sign of the violence ending so the only answer is to let the people there sort it out themselves

2007-01-19 03:02:40 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Asia, but more specifically China and Russia will serve as the deterrent to the US in future years.

2007-01-19 02:51:32 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-19 02:43:55 · 6 answers · asked by jacquie 6

marine corps doctrine or army amphibious warfare tactics. in what ways would the landings on normandy would be more efffective if it was done in this day and age? what lessons we learned in normandy? final question, is an amphibious operation of that size considered obsolete because nowadays we use small unit raids or an amphibious operation of that magnitude is still feasible?

2007-01-19 01:44:57 · 12 answers · asked by Beaujock 1

2007-01-19 01:25:17 · 2 answers · asked by princess_uv_marines 1

I know their primary role was to get rid of the rats and mice on board, and as such the need for a cat has probably died out, but wondered if they might keep them on for tradition or somesuch?

Thanks!

2007-01-19 01:22:31 · 9 answers · asked by DaveyMcB 3

in agra

2007-01-19 01:22:11 · 3 answers · asked by Akhlaque Ahmad 1

2007-01-19 01:12:01 · 23 answers · asked by Akhlaque Ahmad 1

http://www.military.com/forums/0,15240,122396,00.html

2007-01-19 01:09:52 · 23 answers · asked by snickers 3

Lets face it people the Middle East is broken up into Tribes, each tribe would like to see the other DEAD. They have been fighting each other for many hundreds of years. They proberly don't even remember why these days.
Saddam was a hero in his tribe and killed many of the other tribes. Saddam for all his killings kept the tribes from major wars; they were scared of this madman! Yet he kept control.
Is that what is needed again? Do you really think freedom will ever rule in the Middle East? How long before another Ruler like Saddam comes along.
The Leaders in Iraq now will slowly be killed off because they worked with the American's.
Democracy might work for a time over there, just look at history, they used to have Democracy and canned it.

2007-01-19 00:48:46 · 7 answers · asked by Aussie1 2

Based on the anti-satellite news, I think China is trying to get a message to the US or is it just a friendly technology test? What do ya think?

2007-01-19 00:40:14 · 7 answers · asked by Hung N 2

I read US history on how the US Honorable General Custard detailed his men to kill old and injured Indian men, as well as all Indian Women and Childeren when they found them. I read how his men commonly practiced mutliating the bodies living or dead to remove the skin of female mammanary glands and male scotums to be tanned and used for tobacco pounches, so why do they call pre-emptive strike a new policy the army has when they have been using these cowardly practices since then?

2007-01-19 00:37:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Maybe shuttle personnel out to aircraft carriers by helicopter and leave everything else behind

2007-01-19 00:29:24 · 11 answers · asked by rentsdew 2

It was the British who won WW1 due to a Naval Blockade on Germany meaning no food got to the population. The US entered in the summer of 1918 although a year before they declared war on germany ( were ships so slow it took a year to travel 3000miles ). The war ended on 11th Novermber 1918 at 11am. The British had developed tanks before the US came in and had pushed the Germans back. Are you taught that you won WW1 or do you have an accurate teaching of it?

We will accept WW2 was highly down to you though but not WW1. That was Britain as we were the biggest superpower at the time and still were after.

2007-01-19 00:04:37 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous