Government - July 2007

I’m proposing that the United States should look into giving tax benefits to those that have one child for a college paper. And not give tax breaks to those who decide to overpopulate our cities, destroy our education system, and act as if it’s their right for us to support their children. The aim would be to make it socially unacceptable to have more then two children. Instead of implementing cruel policies of forced sterilizations and such, although government sponsored sterilizations and birth control wouldn’t be a bad idea. I’m having trouble finding a primary source I was thinking about using China’s popular one child act, which I would criticize but also encourage some of it at the same time. The only problem is, I can’t find the actual document any help? No I am not looking for anyone to argue my point of view its not even properly established at the moment so please don’t bother all those wanting to yell fascist.

2007-07-30 02:22:24 · 8 answers · asked by Beaverscanttalk 4

2007-07-30 01:33:58 · 30 answers · asked by west world 1

What are the good effects of migration?

2007-07-29 23:46:24 · 2 answers · asked by ead020769 1

Mayor of New Haven conn. has started to issue ID cards to illegal aliens, cops stand around munching on doughnuts rather then arresting the criminals when they come in for the ID cards.

before the pirate king decides to order the police to hold people at gun point while his criminal buddies rob them, i want to find out who has the authority to remove him from office, fire all of the police and restore order.
then pressure that person to do so.

Can the district attorney send in the State Police ?
The Governor send in the National Guard ?
President send in federal troops?

please quote a source, so i can read it myself.

and dont waste my time with how nice illegal aliens are and what a racist i am, it is against the law to assist a criminal. you are a criminal if you are in the country illegally and i dont care what race they are, they can be my race for all i care, a criminal is a criminal.

my family immigrated (LEGALLY ) from Germany, Holland, Canada, England, and Ireland.

2007-07-29 19:36:48 · 8 answers · asked by Jr. is angry 7

I'll admit that I haven't followed this as closely as I should, so I'm asking some of the brightest people I know (YOU GUYS!)
What is it that he has supposedly done that has made him so many enemies?

2007-07-29 16:42:25 · 15 answers · asked by pamela68 4

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007 declares that in the event of a “catastrophic event”, George W. Bush can become what is best described as "a dictator":

"The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government."

This directive, completely unnoticed by the media, and given no scrutiny by Congress, literally gives the White House unprecedented dictatorial power over the government and the country, bypassing the US Congress and obliterating the separation of powers. The directive also placed the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic “security”.

Is this another step towards official martial law? (see “US government fans homeland security fears”), which suggests that a new "catastrophic event" 9/11-type pretext could be in the pipeline.

New presidential directive gives Bush dictatorial power
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHI20070521&articleId=5720

2007-07-29 16:26:12 · 14 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5

They over tax us send all our resources overseas and expect us to flip the bill when we can't even take care of our own people. What are your thoughts on this?

2007-07-29 16:21:32 · 11 answers · asked by sarah76 3

At this point, it would seem, anyone with an ounce of respect for the truth, need only look at the video evidence to know 9/11 was a self inflicted wound; a false flag operation designed to outrage the public and Congress into supporting "The War on Terror"; more like "The War for Oil".

So why does Hillary Clinton keep rallying for "The War on Terror", I mean it is obvious she is not stupid, so what gives?

2007-07-29 16:11:47 · 31 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5

2007-07-29 14:09:14 · 19 answers · asked by topink 6

How many of you think that the US Government is to blame?

2007-07-29 12:26:32 · 23 answers · asked by Molly Leandra 1

Im talking about these tory blue brigade that seem to vote consevative as some kind of class thing. Do they have any idea about what their policies are. In the south east of england these people are everywhere - most of them are over 70 though.

2007-07-29 12:07:37 · 20 answers · asked by jj26 5

If you are thinking of committing a serious crime to steal a great deal of money, can you promise to give Hillary half, to get a pardon later? You could hide your half "off shore" until you buy your way out from the Clintons. Will the Clintons set up a web-site for criminals to bargain for their pardons?

2007-07-29 10:10:02 · 8 answers · asked by ? 7

overthrow their Government because they're crap. Just like New Labour.

2007-07-29 09:47:51 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Would the Secret Service defend him from the Capitol Police? Would the U.S. Marshals carry him out, kicking and screaming? Would his sycophants from the Pentagon attempt a military coup? I don't know what authorities would take precedence in such a scenario - can you explain it?

2007-07-29 09:44:58 · 22 answers · asked by Who Else? 7

Nuts don't fall very far from the tree. Prescott and wealthy American corporations tried to over throw FDR in the 30s.
Its all well documented. I don't have to provide links. Look up the BBC broad cast on Google for July 23, 07. They wanted to set up the same kind of fascist state that operatred in Italy and Germany to end the depression.
Its a fact that Prescott worked with the Nazis until 1942 when he was forced to under the trading with the enemies act. Its also the source of the Bush family fortune.
The Bushes never gave up on fascism to this date.

2007-07-29 09:36:26 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

we have hungry billions. who cares whether a bofor or a F16 fires or misses. the ammunitions can't be eaten. why the govt after govt os hell bent on stockpiling arsenal exported . one nuclear bobm is enough. we need food for our hungry billions. tanks and guns and missiles and submarines can wait.

2007-07-29 09:26:51 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-29 08:02:13 · 1 answers · asked by Freebrum 3

I have seen sicko lately and, as a Canadian living in the US for the past 10 years, was impressed by the movie.
I have seen the 2 sides and think the Canadian system is better overal. I understand the claim many americans say why they are scared to the idea of having a Universal Healthcare system provided by the gvt like in the UK or Canada. That's part of the culture and since we have several huge Health Care Insurance companies trading on the stock market, changing this equation will make them suddenly irrelevant hence big changes and lots of people yelling.
However, I have personally no problem with bringing universal healthcare here, but that's my personal opinion.
But one thing I do believe is the need for Healthcare Insurance not to be money driven. These corporations should be non profit organizations and need to provide a statement of their accounting to show how efficient (how much overhead) they incurred. What's your opinion on such proposition?

2007-07-29 07:22:19 · 5 answers · asked by Phil C 1

I was just thinkin, when did the SSN's start? cuase Ive never heard anyone ever talk about it.

2007-07-29 07:00:23 · 5 answers · asked by cirquegrl07 2

The President made clear which side of health care progress he's on when he recently stated his intention to veto a Senate bill to increase funds for the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). The bipartisan bill proposes to put another $35 billion over five years into a program designed to help families who cannot afford health insurance but earn too much to qualify for Medicaid. “When you expand eligibility, you're really beginning to open up an avenue for people to switch from private insurance to the government," says Bush.
Listening to the President, you just have to ask: What is so damn holy about insurance companies? Should their profits always take precedence over children's health needs?
But what's an extra $35 billion over five years for children's health when compared to the $8.4 billion a month the Iraq war now costs the United States? Indeed, the $5 billion SCHIP currently receives annually in federal funds equals only about three weeks of the war's costs.

2007-07-29 06:57:08 · 19 answers · asked by Richard V 6

2007-07-29 04:49:57 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Proposal: Should only those citizens who pay more in taxes than they receive in government benefits per permitted to vote? [One vote per person only]

Thoughts:

We would need radical tax simplification [eliminate most taxes so that only one or two remain].

We would also need benefit tracing to individuals, plus the benefits received by children and other dependents [immigrant family members, for example].

The taxes and benefits of businesses would need to be allocated [possibly based on percentage ownership for the time owned].

This would permit an annual accounting for each individual of her/his benefits received and taxes paid, after which his eligibility to vote for the next year could be calculated.

The concept could be applied at all levels of government, or at separate levels if all levels eliminated subsidies of programs run by other levels [Federal help for schools, for example]

Politicians would then have less reason to pork for voters.

2007-07-29 04:43:09 · 18 answers · asked by Spock (rhp) 7

D's can be too lenient on crime, but R's make a big deal out of small crimes but don't solve major problems. Some D's are too idealistic, but if R's were to totally control everything, the USA would become like a South American dictatorship. If the D's got out of control with bleeding heart generosity, people would (and do) milk the system and the rich would run w/ their $$. The R's can help by watching for abuses of the welfare system, but R cuts to schools is bad. The R plan of "creating more jobs" means cut full-timers and employees w/benefits and create a larger # of new low paying jobs, part time/no benefits. then the economy looks "good" as stockholders celebrate their gains, while workers lose their good jobs and fall into hard times.The D's are smart enough to not blame the poor, and try to protect workers. The R's would borrow $ and start wars to kill off the poor boys forever w/o the D's. Anyway I think both sides can serve a purpose in balancing the other.

2007-07-29 04:41:29 · 6 answers · asked by topink 6

To me it smacks of fascism. We've always called our country America or the United States, we've never before called it the "Homeland".

2007-07-29 04:32:36 · 8 answers · asked by Dick W 3

2007-07-29 04:16:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-29 03:55:19 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-29 03:06:24 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I live in one right by a nuclear chemical plant that is in Newport Indiana. Does this happen around all nuclear plants? I know that the Army is in charge and the surrounding area is controlled by Parson Infrastructure. Also, heavy---heavy use of chemtrails in the area that helps the medical profession stay in business. Plenty of sleep................however, makes you very forgetful with the chemicals.
Serious replies only as I dont need medication although sometimes I wish that I did!

2007-07-29 03:00:46 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

this man is now serving life in prison in France. i think he was once hired to kill president De Gualle of france.

2007-07-29 01:18:23 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-29 01:11:40 · 10 answers · asked by LongJohns 7