1. If we don't like them.
2. Contaminated goods.
2007-07-29 04:53:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eisbär 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
sounds like homework to me
Off hand, I'd suggest the following:
1. the goods are dangerous for some reason
2. the nation in question is producing the goods [or all goods] by/after violating the fundamental rights of others {Example: a nation that practiced slavery and tried to sell the output of slaves might be embargoed.}
2007-07-29 11:55:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spock (rhp) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. if that nations goods are defective or tainted by contaimination/ poor workmanship/ poor production etc..
2. if proper practices in employment/ treatment of workers--- ie. pay level giving society norms, health coverage for workers, retirement rights etc..--- have been violated to produce the product cheaply.
2007-07-29 11:56:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Donna Le Oiseau de Feu 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a peaceful alternative war to demonstrate an opposition to a nation's policy. It worked well in terms of S. Africa and apartheid but did not work in Cuba.
2007-07-29 11:53:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
dangerous goods and the policies of the government of that country
2007-07-29 13:40:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fair pricing, and balance of trade
2007-07-29 12:05:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by John A 1
·
0⤊
0⤋