English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

1. If we don't like them.
2. Contaminated goods.

2007-07-29 04:53:50 · answer #1 · answered by Eisbär 7 · 0 0

sounds like homework to me

Off hand, I'd suggest the following:


1. the goods are dangerous for some reason

2. the nation in question is producing the goods [or all goods] by/after violating the fundamental rights of others {Example: a nation that practiced slavery and tried to sell the output of slaves might be embargoed.}

2007-07-29 11:55:32 · answer #2 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 0 0

1. if that nations goods are defective or tainted by contaimination/ poor workmanship/ poor production etc..

2. if proper practices in employment/ treatment of workers--- ie. pay level giving society norms, health coverage for workers, retirement rights etc..--- have been violated to produce the product cheaply.

2007-07-29 11:56:34 · answer #3 · answered by Donna Le Oiseau de Feu 3 · 0 0

It is a peaceful alternative war to demonstrate an opposition to a nation's policy. It worked well in terms of S. Africa and apartheid but did not work in Cuba.

2007-07-29 11:53:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

dangerous goods and the policies of the government of that country

2007-07-29 13:40:03 · answer #5 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0 0

Fair pricing, and balance of trade

2007-07-29 12:05:01 · answer #6 · answered by John A 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers