Elections - June 2007

2007-06-14 16:10:16 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

OK - As someone with combat experience - I say lets put the Plantation Boy Democrat, John Edwards in Charge of military operations in Iraq. And lets make his most advid supporter, the Race Baiter himself, Danny Glover the Chief of Operations on the ground in Iraq. This will free up General Pace, to make a run for the White House.

2007-06-14 15:00:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Who is going to be our next president and why? who do you want to represent our nations views?

2007-06-14 14:24:33 · 8 answers · asked by Shoe 3

For the next president of the United States...

Who would Osama vote for (pretending that he could)?

and why?

2007-06-14 12:20:08 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-14 12:13:59 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

You don't have a more honest well informed candidate running for office. This man light's a fire of hope inside so many American's. He is deadly accurate about failed foriegn policy in the middle east. How many men and women will have to die before America wake's up and use's the grey matter between their ear's and stand up for a man who will vehemently defend our constituional right's as free men and women and never abuse habius corpus???? Come on, you really think the other Republican's are better suited and more honest than this man?? For freedom's sake Ron Paul in 2008!!!!!

2007-06-14 12:05:44 · 20 answers · asked by The Angry Dutchman 3

MORE federal control?
Less Local Control?

Why would ANYONE vote to have the Federal Government more in charge than it already is, thus taking away power from the states?

why would anyone support people in WASHINGTON making laws and decisions about what goes on in your own little community? Don't you want Local control? That way, if you don't like the laws.. you can just move to a different state....

2007-06-14 11:57:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-14 10:39:08 · 16 answers · asked by Charles L 1

2007-06-14 08:33:36 · 9 answers · asked by MD 4

Thanks to Bush I cant see how the republican party can continue on ? who said there wasnt a God

2007-06-14 08:05:43 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

This old English colony of ours still has a leftover yen for dynasty--witness the two Bushes even while so many voters held their noses in the booth. Witness the two Adams and Roosevelt presidencies of the past. But we're not English and the urge has its limits. We only went for three Bush terms and regretted it at that. When Franklin Roosevelt had three and a half terms we made it illegal for one president to have more than two.

Hillary has a good shot because so many stupid hard right conservatives will go for the less electable Fred Thompson over Guiliani. But if Hillary Clinton is elected, no matter what happens, I can see people being exhausted if faced with four "Clinton" terms. Do you agree that it would flip over the one and two Bush scenario to a two and one?

2007-06-14 03:17:15 · 18 answers · asked by Benji 5

Why do we need politicians and officials to represent the people? Sure it made sense when our forfathers wrote the constitution, but now we have the telephone, internet, and other communication devices that can connect us to anyone? Could civilians just vote on the issues over the internet, then we dont need a politician to make the decision, it is all done over the computer!!! This would be just like a city hall voting, and is the ideal situation for a democracy.

2007-06-14 03:11:06 · 10 answers · asked by learydisciple 2

2007-06-14 01:07:51 · 2 answers · asked by Jackie C 3

A quick resume, no links please.

2007-06-14 01:07:50 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Who will be the runners?...will there be 3?

2007-06-14 00:56:06 · 4 answers · asked by bruce b 3

Hillary now has a serious lead over Obama but only a 50% approval rating among voters...does she have a chance?

2007-06-14 00:45:50 · 9 answers · asked by bruce b 3

I'm Italian, but I'm interested more to your policy... I'm keeping track of next presidential elections... following events of both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. I think they're skilled, but... maybe Barack Obama lacks in experience... Who do you prefer?

2007-06-14 00:17:52 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Obama could run as VP and succeed Clinton. Do they differ so much on issues where this could not be possible? Or is it a pride thing, where neither would want to settle for VP? I am a novice in the world of politics, but it would seem that together they could run the tables.

2007-06-13 21:19:12 · 12 answers · asked by Mo Du 1

Reported on Headline News June 13, 2007. Kucinich is pushing forward to impeach Cheney irrespective to what Pelosi poses.

2007-06-13 20:22:25 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.diversityinc.com/public/1807.cfm

Oprah Winfrey confirmed her endorsement of Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama on CNN's "Larry King Live" last week. When asked what made her decide to back Obama, Oprah said she believes in Obama's capabilities. "I think that what he stands for, what he has proven that he can stand for, what he has shown was worth me going out on a limb for—and I haven't done it in the past because ... I didn't know anybody well enough to be able to say I believe in this person." But why not endorse Sen. Hillary Clinton? Oprah stressed that her decision to support Obama does not imply she is somehow against Clinton or any other presidential candidate. Oprah's endorsement marks the first time the talk-show host has endorsed a political candidate.

2007-06-13 20:06:05 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Fox News reported this evening 6/13/07.

2007-06-13 19:50:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

...but in "closed primary" states, only Republicans can vote on nominating a Republican candidate. If you're NOT a registered Republican, would you consider registering as a Republican to vote for Ron Paul in the primary (then vote for whomever you want in the general election)?

2007-06-13 19:30:56 · 10 answers · asked by Bambi B 3

Her support continues to grow despite the fond wishes of the conservatives. Do you think it's due to the two debates? If not, what do you think is causing the noticeable shift?

2007-06-13 18:17:54 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-13 17:50:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZl6202HJGQ form 2002 on Taxes almost verbatim as his stance today

2007-06-13 16:38:24 · 6 answers · asked by Thomas from Miisk 2

Many people are discussing Hilary Clinton's run for presidency.If she does become president she'll be the first female president. Do you think that she should be president? Do you think she would be a good one? Lastly, do you think people will only vote for her so we can finally have a female president?

2007-06-13 13:18:35 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'll take a guess. You love the Republican agenda but vote for Democrats as they're the best hope to put more money in your wallets.

My advice to union members..get the hell out of the Democratic Party. We don't want your kind.

2007-06-13 12:54:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I bet they will. All three are taking advantage of the religious right's stupidity.

2007-06-13 11:55:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

My money is on Condi but I think Hillary has a nice hairy set too.

2007-06-13 11:50:48 · 14 answers · asked by anch49 3

2007-06-13 10:51:39 · 16 answers · asked by memo327 1