Elections - June 2007

Given the court testimony and subsequent convictions that took place in Ohio.

video of court testimony
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/usa.election.fraud.testimony.sm.wmv

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/2004votefraud_ohio.html

2007-06-16 14:47:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

we dont impeach good presidents

2007-06-16 13:31:00 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

CNN said that Ron Paul supporters are spamming to win the polls. I don't believe that is why he is winning.

I think Ron Paul truely does have that many supporters that he is winning the online and text message polls without cheating. However, the people that are actively watching the debates and voting in polls right now only make up a small fraction of those that will actually vote.

When the AP, Gallop, Newsweek, or whomever does a scientific poll (where they randomly ask among people who are likely voters), you get a lot of people that haven't paid much attention to the election yet (if at all) and have only heard about the front-runners in the media. These people don't even know who Ron Paul is or that he's running for President.

Agree or disagree?

2007-06-16 13:14:40 · 17 answers · asked by Freethinker 6

I would...just to see what will happen. See if she gets it....see how screwed we are if she does.

2007-06-16 13:00:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-16 12:15:35 · 17 answers · asked by Beauty&Brains 4

Who do you support in 2008 for president?

2007-06-16 11:28:42 · 3 answers · asked by Beauty&Brains 4

let me see , he is a multi millionaire , a 2 term president , a very successful businessman , what is stupid about that . to the people that call him stupid , what are you ?

2007-06-16 10:44:17 · 34 answers · asked by kramer 1

2007-06-16 10:41:03 · 18 answers · asked by kramer 1

He was a legacy at Yale. (He would not have qualified on merit)
He flunked out of the military.
He can barely speak English.
His wife had to help their dumb daughters do their homework.
He really messed up our country...our reputation..our economy and then there's Iraq. Need I say more?

2007-06-16 10:03:35 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-16 09:55:04 · 5 answers · asked by barry c 4

Shall we call him Billo from now on?

2007-06-16 09:38:22 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Maybe some Thompson supporters will have the guts to answer me this time.

Don't you realize he has worked as a high-paid lobbyist for years, wearing $2,000 suits and driving politicians to expensive dinners at the finest restaurants in his black Cadillac limo.

Do you just look at him wearing a cowboy hat, spinning stories about Sam Houston that Tennesee twang while driving a leased, red pick-up truck and say, "Wow, how authentic is THAT!"

2007-06-16 07:38:34 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-16 06:48:54 · 12 answers · asked by Johnny Y 1

Give your reason for his Vote.

2007-06-16 05:21:40 · 12 answers · asked by john 2

2007-06-16 05:01:52 · 6 answers · asked by citizen high 6

Sonia initially & for all these days tried three male names from Congress for President of India. All these were summarily shot down , inter alia ,by her own associates in the UPA itself.
Finally as a LAST resort, a name of this non controversial (and non performing ) female cropped up as a compromise candidate.
Pratibha had done no solid field work, & hence was comparatively free from any scams . In every respect she is mediocre.(Like Nitrogen gas.)Hence there was no opposition to her name from anyone.
Now Sonia is yelling from Rooftops that this selection of a female is her most revolutionary step in the annals of India . If that were indeed so, then why did she not suggest this name in the very first place? She prevaricated till THE LAST stage, that too out of disappointment faced, when all her male nominees were decisively rejected . Except merit, other irrelevent considerations like caste & creed mattered more in this selection. Height of Sonia's hypocricy this is !!

2007-06-16 04:38:57 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I really don't think it is any of our business.I f they have an open Marriage good for them, if it works for them. Look at 90% of the Republicans running they are on their second or thrid wife. Rudy's first wife was his cousin.

By the way never voted for a Clinton and I live in New York.

2007-06-16 02:06:02 · 13 answers · asked by G O 5

what do u say,can she become prez insted of pramoting others.can she do the job.

2007-06-16 01:27:21 · 12 answers · asked by toploser 5

His feeble attempts at intimidation does not impress me much.

Phil Donohue ate his @$$ for lunch one day when he tried that. You can probably see it on youtube.

2007-06-15 21:35:03 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

I would like to hear your reasons.

2007-06-15 21:17:38 · 16 answers · asked by xwhysquared 2

2007-06-15 20:20:35 · 17 answers · asked by Mr Pink 4

In Chicago,for example,they do not have this-and they should,in my opinion.

2007-06-15 19:47:54 · 4 answers · asked by nofear_intrepid40 1

That it was always the plan? I mean, we're building an embassy compound - on what? 250ish acres?? Whewww daddy, that's some embassy - it's more like 'embassy city'. A city within a city.

2007-06-15 16:50:34 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

dealing with someone being Independent, do so many people say well you can vote in a Primary. The state of new york has an Indepent primary. And most Independent voters are looking for someone who has their own ideas not a party that they have to vote with.

2007-06-15 16:19:02 · 6 answers · asked by G O 5

2007-06-15 15:29:50 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Who are you leaning towards & why?

2007-06-15 14:40:01 · 12 answers · asked by Smart Kat 7

Should I trademark my questions as if I'm alone with these thoughts?

Thoughts:

I think it would be NEAT! if:

1) All of the immigrants who are being coddled by the Polliticks would collectively BARF! on the Polliticks at the same time. Perhaps from airplanes at low altitudes so that the objective targets could be hit over a larger area.

2) All of the other "classified/divided" voters would join in on the "BARFING"!

3) If Polliticks would stop agitating us with this coddling of people's (groups) personal needs ahead of everyones collective needs.

I'm bored with:
The hispanic vote.
The white male vote.
The soccer Mom vote.

etc...

What the hell happened to the American Vote?

Suckers?

The polliticks are more concerned with your votes (groups votes) than they are about your groups needs anyway.

It goes like this:

Get the votes...Then do what you wanted to do in the first place now that you no longer depend on their votes.

Suckers!

2007-06-15 12:56:48 · 11 answers · asked by md.pierce 2

2007-06-15 12:43:55 · 21 answers · asked by catchup 3

Just wonder if there is any connection...

2007-06-15 12:16:04 · 14 answers · asked by Martin L 5

2007-06-15 12:11:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous