Elections - September 2007

Knowing what you know now, would you have changed your vote, and if not why, other then blatant partisanship

2007-09-30 21:45:15 · 16 answers · asked by MattMan 3

I smell a rat or double standard. You line yourself with good people around you right?

2007-09-30 21:25:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think that the main thing that Bill and Hilliary have in common is that they both like women?

2007-09-30 21:11:49 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

...and voted for "Mickey Mouse" on the line where it says "other:_____________"?

2007-09-30 20:56:04 · 8 answers · asked by ǝɯɐuɹǝsn ɔıɹǝuǝƃ 3

i think so ....obviously i dont remember all the presidents but i cant imagine a more horrible pres has ever been in office.what do you think?

2007-09-30 19:00:45 · 28 answers · asked by RD 3

Why do the Clintons do the bidding of the chicoms
they seem to always get into trouble. do they just take money from anyone

2007-09-30 18:38:43 · 2 answers · asked by Michael B 6

2007-09-30 16:55:42 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think the country could have survived if Johnson had been thrown out of office? He was impeached because he and Congress could not agree on reconstruction plans. Many northerners opposed him because he was a southern sympathizer. However, the argument for his impeachment was weak, and he was kept in office because the Senate was 1 vote short of conviction. Yet if Johnson had been impeached, what do you think would be the impact on the country that was desperately trying to rebuild? Would Johnson's conviction have been beneficial, or would the country have been thrown into further turmoil?

2007-09-30 16:47:13 · 2 answers · asked by N4Y4 2

Obama has a Muslim background. How do you feel about having a president who could be a Muslim ?

2007-09-30 15:30:39 · 22 answers · asked by NICOLE 2

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21033583
^^ article

What is the significances of this?

2007-09-30 14:28:48 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-30 14:00:55 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-30 13:32:48 · 13 answers · asked by kramer 1

When he ran Cleveland back in the 70s he did so much good for it....I actually think everyone running for office are a bunch of aholes but what do you think?

2007-09-30 13:32:07 · 13 answers · asked by ? 2

because they might have more wisdom knowledge.

2007-09-30 13:29:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

or at least against late abortions after the cells have actually begun to form a foetus already! ...and one who will allow gays the same rights as any other couple but not make such a fuss over it so as to give them special treatment. anybody with a platform like that? :/ if so, do tell me who.

2007-09-30 13:29:01 · 4 answers · asked by killer_ballerina 3

how will barack Obama help stop global warming?

2007-09-30 12:27:34 · 16 answers · asked by livelaughlove1379 3

2007-09-30 11:11:32 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://ronpaul2008.com
http://johnedwards.com

Both ran fundraising drives for $1 million. Ron Paul's started out as being for $500,000, but he eventually made it a million and made it in 6 days. Edwards is on his 10th day and is just shy of a million for his $1 million in 10 days drive.

Considering the differences in name recognition (and I don't think it is possible to "spam" campaign donations), doesn't this mean that Ron Paul is more legitimate of a candidate than John Edwards and if so, doesn't that make him a "top-tier" candidate?

How much longer will it be possible for the haters to deny that he is "top-tier?" Their arguments are falling apart faster than the New York Mets.

2007-09-30 10:55:58 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm very much confused about our political future. Can you trust your government to make America safe.? I believe in order to have a safe society, It involves everyone working together for the same reason. The reason being "FREEDOM". Ha! Ha! Ha! gotcha' Bullshit, It'll never happen!

2007-09-30 10:16:08 · 9 answers · asked by Jimbobswayforme 2

To many people don't bother, but what would you do to convince them that neglecting their right to vote may only hurt the country in the long run ?

2007-09-30 09:55:38 · 28 answers · asked by www.shutup.com 2

2007-09-30 09:19:22 · 8 answers · asked by cali.rocz 2

Forcing the masses out of the cities into the countryside to work the fields. I think I'll try it when I come to rule this country.

2007-09-30 07:08:17 · 5 answers · asked by Hillary Clinton 2

Why should our gov subsidise big business, and why should presidential canidates be allowed to accept big donations from big buisness. Laws will be passed or lifted to support those with deep pockets regardless of party. why should we not stop this.

2007-09-30 07:02:21 · 13 answers · asked by Boston George 3

- Cut spending and taxes
- End the war and bring troops home
- shrink government and let state side decide on more issues
- Secure borders and not grant anmesty




Ron Paul seems to be the only candidate which will do something about the borders and end the war. Voting to continue the war will eventually lead to high taxes to pay for it.

2007-09-30 06:40:07 · 18 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6

Giuliani stated that he is the only GOP who can beat Hillary. First of all, he would not win if only Republicans were running. He assumes that all of America has bought into the lie that he is a 9/11 hero. He is a 9/11 thief. Those who actually did the work knows firsthand how he panicked and frozed in shock. Ironically, he readily took the credit.

He advocates for illegals and does not take our borders seriously. He is either delusional or on LSD. He is too weird looking to be taken seriously. He is simply Hillary in drag. We do need someone to save us from Jezebel, I mean Hillary. Can you imagine, eight years of Bill the sociopathic liar followed by eight years of Bush the terminator followed by eight years of Hillary the queen of conn. A quarter century of the dingbats dynasty.

Let's hope that someone wins with a stellar record.

2007-09-30 06:13:01 · 7 answers · asked by shawnLacey 4

2007-09-30 03:54:19 · 12 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6

Her idea to give $5000 dollars to every new born, seems like the chocolate milk vote to me.
When I was in 3rd grade we had a vote for school president, and he promised us chocolate milk with our school lunch.
Sure we got our chocolate milk, but we had to pay the difference, it wasn't a free addition to our lunch.
Isn't she trying the same scam, just to get votes from the naive people?

2007-09-30 03:50:55 · 19 answers · asked by Chunky 3

If the presidental election was today, and you had to vote... who would you vote for?

2007-09-30 03:08:04 · 8 answers · asked by brittany7790 3

Back to the good old days,,even my fellow republicans admit they were good and prosperous times. i get a kick out of those that still say he lacks morals..lol. He may have lied but nobody died..GO HILLARY

2007-09-30 00:29:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-29 22:27:40 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous