Elections - September 2007

2007-09-27 11:43:26 · 13 answers · asked by chicalinda 3

its for a debate in my class.

2007-09-27 11:42:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I dont mean to offend anyone. I really would like to know if this is the case.thx♥

2007-09-27 11:25:22 · 24 answers · asked by ♥Grown Woman♥ 4

Neither of them have the details of the war, or the bomb that hit Syria, therefore, to tip your hat that you will end the war and bring home the troops, right now, is not the truth.

Will you vote for either of them, and who will you vote for if any Democrat candidate?

2007-09-27 11:18:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

During the last debate Neither Sen. Clinton or Sen. Obama would commit to bringing the troops home before the end of their first term. They have both insisted Pres. Bush do this "NOW."

If they have flipped now, will they fip again? And if they have flipped on National Security, what CAN you trust them on?

Honest answers only please... I'm interested in your point of view.

Douglas

2007-09-27 10:51:46 · 19 answers · asked by prancinglion 5

2007-09-27 10:35:12 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean think about this. A guy who has no sense to turn his cell phone off during a movie then takes the call and proceeds to have a conversation. What sort of judgment is that? Oh yea, and he likes to wear a dress from time to time.

I just described Rudy Guliani. Would you vote for that guy?

2007-09-27 10:25:12 · 7 answers · asked by loudwalker 2

Felons vote Democratic, national study says

If disenfranchised felons had been allowed to vote, they would have swung the 2000 presidential race to Al Gore, according to a national study Republicans are touting in their fight to overturn Christine Gregoire’s victory in last fall’s governor’s race.

The study posits that since racial minorities and the poor – groups that tend to vote for Democrats– make up a disproportionate number of felons, a hypothetical felon voting bloc would be so overwhelmingly Democratic it could swing national and statewide elections.

On average, 74 percent of felons would have voted Democratic in presidential and U.S. Senate elections dating back to 1972, according to the study’s analysis of demographic and voting data.

http://dwb.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/4850294p-4452879c.html

2007-09-27 10:24:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/tales-from-the-obamas-bedroom/

2007-09-27 10:22:15 · 8 answers · asked by Sopwith 4

i just got elected for school council and now i need another kick a*s speech

2007-09-27 10:19:51 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

She seems to make a lot of comments about him that don't really help him (first the smoking disclosure, then the morning stinkiness and now the comment that if he doesn't win the Iowa primary his campaign is just a dream). It almost looks like she is working against him.

2007-09-27 10:13:11 · 6 answers · asked by The trains will run on time! 3

Need I say more? George Bush should have never been president the first time and he got elected twice! Now the nation and the worl are paying the price, we have ourselves to blame. State of mind is me vote? for what? He's for what DUMMIES!

2007-09-27 10:07:34 · 6 answers · asked by John S 2

I ask this because in 2006 the left ran on stopping the War Now Obama and Hillary are talking about winning the quote unwinnable war. How will this effect the 2008 elections and the democrat party and or their majority.

I mean to run on peace and then deliver war is no change at all except for how is in power and increased taxes.

2007-09-27 10:01:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

with her and Bill? Can she banish him from the proceedings altogether so that we don't have to see him again when he leaves office?

2007-09-27 09:20:45 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-27 09:11:51 · 17 answers · asked by Future 5

2007-09-27 09:09:43 · 17 answers · asked by Obama2009 2

He also said "There are WMDs, no doubt about ", then said "There are no Wmd's"

Question: What kind of an idiotic simpleton are we dealing with here?

2007-09-27 09:08:42 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I do! Ask me why! Okay I'll tell you. :)
Because she keeps saying 'in the Clinton administration this...in the clinton Administrations that...' and talking about "when 'we' left office there was so much money and now there's a deficit" whatever whatever. But THEN she says she's running on her own, not with Bill. She's being too hypocritical!

2007-09-27 09:07:48 · 11 answers · asked by cuteness 4

2007-09-27 08:50:55 · 4 answers · asked by Sopwith 4

now I was out of the country then and have no recall as to this, is this correct and can someone tell me what happened. boy am I out of touch!

2007-09-27 08:18:34 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

It seems we would have a better republic.

2007-09-27 06:42:20 · 26 answers · asked by lu_dicrous 3

A recent question asked about Bill Clinton's status after Hillary is elected (should that be the case), and was met with a flood of crude, hateful, and bone-ignorant responses that alluded to his tryst with Monica.

Consider the fact that Bill was one of our greatest presidents, in that his decade of the '90s was the most peaceful and prosperous in American history. And consider the fact that the incident with Monica was one of two consenting adults, during their free time, in private, in Bill's legitimately-attained domicile... and thus was NO one else's business...

...I am nothing short of AMAZED at the level of ignorance it would take to WHINE about that. And that so **many** people who participate in here would lower themselves to such levels of mindless hatefulness. Thus -- my question, above.

2007-09-27 06:06:56 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

how in the world is guliani the front runner for the nomination. here is a guy that is bush on steroids. arrogant , thoughtless, a tough talker who doesn't listen and can't get along with anyone. (ask his kids or 2 exwives about that).there are good republican choices such as mike huckabee or ron paul. why would you want more of the failed bush regime.

2007-09-27 06:02:38 · 8 answers · asked by doc_of_three 2

Isn't it time to change that and not vote for a Bush or a Clinton?

Isn't it time for some new blood and new ideas in the office?

Vote for a change.

2007-09-27 05:52:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Been blocked by Ron Paul supporters? Seems they don't want me telling folks to read his voting record and stances somewhere other than his website.

2007-09-27 05:41:54 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Id rather have Bill in there than Hillary. Dude, Im scared seriously. She would probably let Iran nuke us for oil. I am truly scared.

2007-09-27 05:10:45 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm not sure I want him near the White House.

2007-09-27 05:07:40 · 17 answers · asked by LindaAnn 4

This is a polling question.

a) 18-25
b) 26-35
c) 36-45
d) 46-55
e) 55+

2007-09-27 04:43:12 · 12 answers · asked by Think Richly™ 5

It's a legitimate question because i know alot of people who would say no they wouldn't so i'm trying to understand the root cause of this? Yes rascism plays a part, but also i think its the fear of change. Every president has been a white male. Can't we just look at a person based on the their character and how they conduct themselves instead of the color of their skin?

2007-09-27 04:22:56 · 32 answers · asked by Balrog 2

obviously by not voting for hillary ,but it just seems to be overlooked.

2007-09-27 03:18:21 · 11 answers · asked by ? 7