Neither of them have the details of the war, or the bomb that hit Syria, therefore, to tip your hat that you will end the war and bring home the troops, right now, is not the truth.
Will you vote for either of them, and who will you vote for if any Democrat candidate?
2007-09-27 11:18:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Senior Richardson doesn't have a snowballs chance.
2007-09-27 11:22:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Kucinich has outlined how he will immediately end the war. Seeing that the other options are Billary or Osama, I'll take my chances and roll the dice on Kucinich or Paul. I think other people should too.
2007-09-27 11:24:08 · answer #2 · answered by chicalinda 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
so they lied because you don't believe them? I don't think you actually understand what the meaning of the word lie is. Let me show you. George Bush lied when he said Iraqi oil would pay for the war. You see it's a lie because it's not true, not just because I didn't believe it.
2007-09-27 11:21:53 · answer #3 · answered by crushinator01 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
They're politicians, so they prettymuch lie every time they open thier mouths. However, committing to do something while lacking full information isn't exactly lying, it's just being foolish.
2007-09-27 11:21:20 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why are you concerned with two candidates that have virtually no chance of getting nominated?
2007-09-27 11:21:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Whoever gets the nomination. I will not vote Republican ever again.
2007-09-27 11:29:30 · answer #6 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Your question is really not logical.
2007-09-27 11:27:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋